04 April
0Comments

The Flying Cars Are Coming … To the New York Auto Show

Photo: Terrafugia

There’s a flying car coming to the New York International Auto Show this week. The Terrafugia Transition is a two-seat airplane with foldable wings, four wheels and turn signals. Over the past few years the Massachusetts company has called its creation a “roadable aircraft” and lately, a “street legal airplane.” But ahead of the Transition’s first appearance at an auto show, it’s perhaps more appropriate to simply call it what it is: a flying car.

Terrafugia and its Transition have been around for several years, but until now the company has largely stuck to the aviation community. But Terrafugia co-founder and CEO Carl Dietrich says that looking at the people who have placed orders for the $279,000 vehicle, they thought it would be worth looking outside the aviation world.

“We’ve noticed in our order backlog there are actually a fair number of people who are not currently pilots who are putting deposits down to order a Transition.”

So the company is coming to New York to gauge interest in a flying car from the non-pilot sector of the public, hoping the attraction of a flying car can create a few pilots and most importantly, customers.

Development of the Transition is progressing and last month Terrafugia completed the first flight of the production prototype. Dietrich expects flight testing to continue through 2012 and deliveries to begin next year.

The dream of a flying car has been around for a long, long time. And in recent years we’ve seen a dune-buggy-turned-car that flies like a powered parachute aimed at accessing remote parts of the developing world, and even aerospace guru Burt Rutan explored the concept in his final days at Scaled Composites.

Just today a Dutch company announced the successful first flights of the PAL-V, a single-seat three-wheeler that’s also a gyrocopter. But as is the case with many inventions that try to combine two already matured products, one plus one does not usually equal two.

The PAL-V One from Holland. Photo: PAL-V

The math doesn’t quite work out on the Transition either, though it’s arguably the most serious attempt at producing anything close to a practical flying car. It’s a decent airplane and as a car it can get you from A to B. The biggest challenge is finding the niche that can be served by the Transition which is neither a great airplane nor a great car. Terrafugia’s Dietrich says that marketplace might be people who fall in between the long driving commute or short airplane flight.

“If you’re flying 1,000 nautical miles, you’re probably going to want a higher performance aircraft” he says. “But if you’re flying 100, 200 or 300 miles, this might be ideal.”

With a cruise speed of 105 miles per hour, the Transition is faster than a car, especially considering it can often travel in a straight lines rarely available on the road. But it’s slower than many other Light Sport Aircraft (LSA), many of which fly at speeds closer to 135 mph. And comparing it to other new LSAs, the Transition is at least $100,000 more than most models.

But what Terrafugia believes is the value in the Transition is the convenience of always having the option of driving if the weather or some other issue prevents a safe flight. It’s true that one of the biggest challenges general aviation pilots face is being grounded because of bad weather. Many small aircraft can fly in inclement weather, but it requires more training and often more equipment to do so safely. So Terrafugia is touting the fact that its relatively simple light sport aircraft won’t force you to wait, or have to rent a car, just to finish a trip. Just fold up the wings and continue your journey on the ground.

Of course then you’ll be driving a rather delicate $279,000 car down the road. Little has been said about the cost of somebody backing into your folded wing. Something as simple as a minor fender-bender may be a bit more expensive than simply replacing a bumper.

Terrafugia’s Transition in flight. Photo: Terrafugia

Despite any potential drawbacks, Terrafugia has found a customer base that believes the flying car makes sense. Dietrich says about two-thirds of their existing customers are looking at the Transition as a practical form of transportation to suit their specific needs. Examples include a surveyor who could travel quickly to jobs around the state and a real estate developer who likes the idea of being able to scout new sites from above and give aerial tours to customers. The other third simply see the Transition as a fun vehicle and like the idea of owning a flying car.

For the rest of the population there are plenty of ground-bound vehicles to look at this week in New York and lots of plenty of airplanes to see at shows like Airventure in Oshkosh. So the challenge will be to decide whether or not the $279,000 Transition is a better option than a $100,000 Porsche Carrera plus a $160,000 Flight Design CTLS (leaving some extra cash for those car rentals).

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

08 February
0Comments

GE Heads North For New Jet Engine Ice Test Facility

Jet engines on airliners can swallow a fair amount of ice during a flight, and to make sure they’re up to the task, engine makers bombard them with all kinds of frozen water. This week General Electric pulled the cover off its newest engine testing facility in the appropriately cold location of Winnipeg, Manitoba. The testing ground is designed to take advantage of the cold Canadian winters for ice certification of new jet engines.

Because a jet engine can encounter icing conditions as it flies through clouds, the Federal Aviation Administration requires several tests to ensure engines can operate in freezing conditions. Tests include blasting engines with tiny ice particles similar to those found in clouds, as well as coating engine parts in ice. That’s done to check the associated risk of those parts being iced over and the risk of ice breaking loose and going deeper into the engine.

General Electric says Winnipeg’s 50-plus days of sub-zero temperatures annually makes the new location ideal for cold weather testing. The company runs another test facility in Peebles, Ohio, but the weather there isn’t reliabily cold enough.

 

Seven fans push air through the 21-foot wind tunnel before 125 nozzles spray tiny water droplets that freeze before pelting the test engine, which normally would be mounted where the plastic is in the top photo. The facility also will perform other tests, including bird ingestion testing (typically performed with dead turkeys tossed into the engine.) and water/torrential rainstorm simulations.

The seven high powered fans that push the air through the wind tunnel at GE’s new engine test facility.

New jet engines are key to commercial aviation’s push for greater fuel efficiency. Airplane makers like Boeing and Airbus rarely miss the chance to tout how new airplanes such as the 787 Dreamliner or A350 XWB consume much less fuel than comparable airliners. Engines from General Electric, Rolls Royce, Pratt & Whitney and others account for a large part of those fuel savings.

The first version of the new GE engines on the 787 initially missed some key efficiency requirements. But the next generation GEnx-1B engines flew for the first time Wednesday on GE’s 747 test airplane over California’s Mojave desert. The new engines include small changes to the design that should recover most of the missing efficiency GE hoped for when the engines were designed. The engine is expected to receive certification this summer.

The Boeing 787 is offered with both General Electric and Rolls Royce jet engines. The only 787s currently flying, with All Nippon Airways of Japan, use Rolls Royce engines.

In other news, last week saw a few headaches for some early long-haul flights by ANA’s new 787, according to Flight Global. On two flights from Tokyo to Frankfurt, passengers ended up flying on Boeing 777s instead after a flap malfunction and software issue forced the new Dreamliner into the maintenance shop. The relatively minor issues were quickly repaired and the plane returned to service.

Photo: GE

 

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

12 January
0Comments

High Winds Forcing Pitstops On Transatlantic Flights

Several airlines are experiencing higher than normal winds on routes between the United States and Europe, forcing pilots to stop for gas on what would normally be a non-stop route. Unplanned pitstops are nothing new. But with airlines looking to save costs wherever possible, several are relying narrow body aircraft flying close to the limit of their range to serve city pairs that would not fill up a larger, and longer range airplane.

In December United reported 43 stops for extra fuel out of some 1,100 transatlantic flights using the company’s Boeing 757s according to the Wall Street Journal. The Boeing 757 has long been favored by many airlines for longer routes with lower passenger demand. Though out of production for several years, the 757 offers carriers a range of more than 4,500 miles in a small enough package to keep operating costs low enough to justify routes that could not fill the larger 767 or Airbus A330. American and US Airways also use the 757 on transatlantic routes and have reported more than normal fuel stops. Delta has the largest 757 fleet in the world, but says it has yet to need a fuel stop for its transatlantic flights this winter according to the Journal article.

Weather forecasts usually provide accurate enough wind predictions for pilots to adjust fuel loads on an airplane to ensure a non-stop flight. And airplanes often fly with less than full tanks since the engines end up burning more fuel in order to carry the weight of the extra gallons. But with the higher winds, even full tanks may not be enough. Airlines are having to stop at airports along the great circle route between Europe and the United States including in Ireland, Iceland, Canada and even as close as Maine and New York before continuing on to their final destinations.

Airlines are required to carry enough fuel to complete the flight to the destination based on the weather forecast, fly on to a nearby alternate airport if weather or some other issue prevented a landing at the planned destination and still have enough fuel for 45 minutes of flying. The idea is to have enough reserve fuel for unanticipated problems beyond bad weather in the forecast.

It’s possible that some of these flights would have made it to their destinations without refueling, but the pilots are opting to stop for gas in order to prevent using up their reserve fuel.

United says it is compensating passengers for missed flights, hotels and other hassles encountered when the flight includes a visit to somewhere like Gander in eastern Canada. Before modern long range airliners were able to make non-stop transatlantic flights, airports like the ones in Canada, Iceland and Ireland were commonly used as refueling stops for flights between the North America and Europe. The Boeing 707 made a fuel stop in Gander on its way to Paris during its much heralded first flight from New York with Pan Am in 1958.

Today many major cities on both continents are linked by non-stop flights. The longest non-stop flight currently being flown by an airline links Newark, New Jersey to Singapore aboard a Singapore Airlines flight that stretches the range to just under 10,000 miles. The flight lasts more than 18 hours.

Photo: Flickr/curimedia

 

 

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

20 October
0Comments

iPhone 4S: Siri is Impressive, But Still a Work in Progress REVIEW

Apple is bringing speech recognition to the masses with its new iPhone 4S, equipped with an intelligent assistant named Siri. It’s a major differentiator for the new iPhone, setting it apart from its predecessors. I’ve been using speech recognition software for the past 8 years, so I was eager to take this enhanced version of Siri for a spin. Here’s my review.

Siri is not new. It started its life as an experiment funded by DARPA, said to be the largest artificial intelligence project to date. Next, Siri, with the same Nuance speech recognition tech built in that also powers the application I’ve been using for years, Dragon NaturallySpeaking, was first available as a free app on the iPhone in February, 2010. Then Apple bought Siri in April of 2010 and decided to incorporate it into its new iPhone 4S, breaking the old Siri app on other iPhones (unless you want to perform a crude hack).

So now Siri is baked into every iPhone 4S, and not available elsewhere. Siri has come a long way since it was first introduced as a less-accurate and somewhat incomplete iPhone app. Now it’s better integrated into iOS 5, and my immediate impression is that it’s more accurate than it’s ever been. Even in a noisy environment inside a car going 60 miles an hour, it can still understand most of what you’re saying if you hold the iPhone up to your ear. Its speech recognition isn’t perfect, and some of its errors are laughable, but in a quiet environment its accuracy is nearly equal to that of the desktop version of NaturallySpeaking running on extremely powerful processors.

Its integration into the iPhone 4S’s iOS 5 software makes it convenient to use. You press and hold the iPhone 4S’s Home button, and it springs to life, sounding a short beep to signal for you to begin speaking. You can use it in this speakerphone mode, or if the iPhone 4S is turned on, you can simply raise the handset to your ear (a necessity when riding in a noisy vehicle) and the phone’s proximity sensor activates Siri, usually prompting you to begin speaking (inexplicably, sometimes it doesn’t respond).

That odd non-working tendency must be why Apple is still calling Siri “beta.” The company reassures users that the Siri will be continuously improved, adding that the software learns how you speak as you go and will perform more accurate recognition as it learns your way of speaking. Still, loading beta software into a new piece of iPhone hardware is a thin thread on which to differentiate this new product. Only a company with the chutzpah of Apple would have the courage to try something like this. But Siri works just barely well enough for Apple to pull it off, bolstered by the iPhone 4S’s faster processor and better camera (among what Apple boasts as 197 other incremental improvements), all doing their part to strengthen the lure of this updated iPhone.

Over the 48 hours I’ve been using Siri, it’s hard to tell if it’s actually improving its speech recognition, but as it stands, it’s just good enough to be fun to use. I especially like the way you can almost carry on a conversation with it. For example, you can ask it, “How’s the weather in New York today?” It will answer by showing you the iPhone’s weather app with New York’s data displayed. Then, if you ask it, “Where are the good Italian restaurants there?,” Siri responds by finding 24 Italian restaurants in New York, sorted by rating. It knows you’re still talking about New York. Clever.

As you can read in our posts about Siri, it does bring a slight attitude along with it, which I find refreshing. Other times, it has hilarious misunderstandings, such as when I asked it yesterday to “Call me an ambulance,” and it responded, “From now on, I’ll call you ‘an ambulance’. Okay?” I was disappointed to hear Siri’s voice, which still sounds way too robotic for my taste. I was thinking that somehow, now that Apple owns the app, it would gussy it up to sound more like GPS units do, or like the mellifluous yet mutinous HAL 9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey. But I suspect that’s still way off in the future. Instead, there are some oddities in its stilted pronunciation, such as the way Siri says the word “restaurant,” speaking with a drawl that sounds like it’s straight out of my native Southern U.S.: “Resta-runt.” Grandma, is that you?

Among its myriad capabilities, of course Siri can help you place phone calls with aplomb, where all you have to do is speak the name of anyone in your Contacts app, and it quickly connects you (something that’s been possible for years with much lesser cellphones). Beyond that, it can also help you speak an email and turn it into text, where it walks you through by asking who you’re sending it to, the subject line and so forth. However, it’s not too adept at breaking out separate paragraphs of text, even if I spoke to it the way I do with NaturallySpeaking, specifying things such as “new paragraph.” Although the email function could be useful for creating short emails while driving (not recommended), it still has some polishing to do before it’s truly useful for sending emails solely by speech.

Some of its capabilities go deeply into science fiction territory, such as pushing and holding the Home button, and then telling it to set a timer for 15 minutes. I especially like telling it to set an alarm, asking it directions, or asking it to launch a playlist in iTunes. I was disappointed to see that it wasn’t able to interact with Twitter, but I found a workaround for that, so that problem is solved already. Still, Apple should have made that capability available from the beginning, and if the company follows through on its promise, we will soon see a lot more interaction with various iOS apps.

Siri on the iPhone 4S still feels like a work in progress. I think it could have used another few months of development before it was released to push it well beyond gimmick territory. But Apple was already later than usual in its product cycle with this iPhone 4S, so might have been compelled to release it early. Even so, Siri as it stands now gives us a hint at what’s to come, and the future looks bright.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

07 October
0Comments

Marketing of the placebo: Everyone gets their own belief

The placebo effect isn’t a lie. In fact, if you believe something is going to help you get better, it may very well do just that.

This very same effect works with stereo equipment, wine, politicians… just about everything where our belief intersects with reality.

You can believe that Ford is better than Chevy, that California reds are better than French ones and that your particular tribe is right (and that everyone else is wrong.)

Marketers love the placebo effect because it opens the door to stories and fables and word of mouth and varied perceptions. It gives marketers room to sell more than price and features. The first cultural byproduct this benefit creates is the notion that everyone is entitled to believe what they believe, and it’s rude to question it.

The second, is a real problem, though. If you spend enough time experiencing your own take on reality, you come to believe that what works for you might actually be a universal truth. Marketing plus psychology might equal science, it seems.

For the placebo to work, you have to believe it, but sometimes believing requires suspension of your connection with verifiable fact.

When that happens, we might believe that we’re entitled to believe things that conflict with demonstrable truth and an understanding of reality. With enough internal spin, you can believe that the moon walk was a fake, that levitation is possible and that the world is only 6,000 years old. You are welcome to believe that aqua metals will improve your sports performance and that z-rays will cure your arthritis, but only until it collides with things that are actually true. Placebos are a good thing, and everyone is entitled to their own beliefs, but they’re not entitled to their own science.

We now have to deal with the fallout from personal science. We’ve so blurred the lines between stories we tell ourselves and our perception of the outside world that it’s easy to be confused and easier still to confuse others if it advances your cause.

Consider the fact that the world is getting warmer. To be clear, everyone is entitled to have an opinion on what to do about global warming. The question I’m wondering about is whether we should solicit the opinions of the population as to whether or not it exists. We’re asking people to bring their knowledge of statistics, earth science and atmospherics to bear on analyzing data… Of course, most people don’t have that knowledge, or care that they don’t. If all that matters is belief, why should they?

Dylan told us that you don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows… I’m not sure you need to take a poll either.

Before you send me an angry email, consider that the question of what we should do about the trend is a different discussion, one that should be had. The question of how (or if) we should take action is not what this post is about. The trend I’m concerned with is the notion that we’re entitled to get upset when the truth doesn’t match our point of view. Does the weather care what you think?

By Seth Godin: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/

02 August
0Comments

38 New Digital Media Resources You May Have Missed

Aaaaand…we’re back! The list might seem intimidating, but this week’s roundup of top Mashable features will ultimately save you loads of time otherwise spent scouring the web for tech resources.

We’ve compiled the past week’s features, how-tos and insights into a handy little package — and it’s just for you. Presenting everything from geeky galleries to thoughtful think pieces, this handy guide is here to help.


Editors’ Picks



Social Media


For more social media news and resources, you can follow Mashable’s social media channel on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.


Tech & Mobile


For more business news and resources, you can follow Mashable’s business channel on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.


Business & Marketing


For more business news and resources, you can follow Mashable’s business channel on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.


Image courtesy of Flickr, webtreats.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

15 June
0Comments

Solar Car Carrier Sees The Light Of Day With Hybrid Power

Starting this month, Toyota’s hybrid cars might be arriving on a hybrid ship augmented by solar power.

We first told you about the Auriga Leader, a 60,000 ton carrier that can ferry up to 6,200 cars, back in 2008. It was retrofitted with a giant bank of solar cells in hopes of reducing CO2 emissions and fuel use while carrying mostly Toyotas across the Pacific.

During tests, solar energy made up for one percent of the ship’s total electricity usage — a small percentage, but enough to save 13 tons of fuel. However, solar power also turned out to be just too unreliable as even as a secondary standalone power source on such a large vessel, causing major spikes and shortages of electricity depending on cloud cover.

“Even a slight change in the weather has a significant influence on the amount of power generated,” said NYK line, the Japanese operator of the Auriga Leader. Engineers looked into expanding the number of photovoltaic cells on board, but found that just exacerbated the problem of passing clouds and storms. ”Attempting to make the solar power system bigger to gain more output and to increase its dependency could result in problems with regard to stable operations due to fluctuations in the power supply,” the company said.

Researchers turned to the same solution that land-based solar generating stations use to keep the power on when the sun isn’t out: really big batteries.

The Auriga Leader

The Auriga Leader is setting sail this month with hybrid power system that’s been under development since 2009. On board are massive Gigacell branded nickel-hydrogen batteries, developed by Kawasaki Heavy Industries. The batteries charge and discharge based on the power demands of the ship and the electricity generated by the solar cells.

The latest test is partially funded by Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. If it’s successful, Kawasaki and NYK line hope to commercialize it to decrease the emissions and fuel use of cargo ships, which burn an average 120 gallons of fuel per mile.

In addition to the solar cells, the Auriga Leader’s diesel generator is also being retrofit to run on low-sulfur diesel, and the ship getting a ballast water treatment system to prevent the introduction of invasive species to the ports it visits.

The hybrid powerplant

Photos: NYK Line

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

03 May
0Comments

U. of Michigan Solar Car Slims Down to Go Down Under

Only two things matter when building a race car powered by the sun: maximizing efficiency and minimizing weight. Everything else is secondary when the goal is crossing a continent using just enough energy to power a hair dryer.

All the top teams in the esoteric sport of solar racing embrace this “less is more” ethos to a degree that would please Colin Chapman. But the University of Michigan, arguably America’s best team, has taken it to fanatical levels in a relentless drive to win the World Solar Challenge in October.

The biennial sprint across Australia is the oldest and most prestigious race of its kind, the Daytona 500 or Monaco Grand Prix of solar racing. No American team has won the 1,800-mile race since General Motors’ Sunraycer led the inaugural run in 1987. The University of Michigan Solar Car Team is determined to end the drought. It has spent more than $1 million building Quantum, its most advanced solar car ever.

“It’s the ultimate electric vehicle,” said Chris Hilger, a junior chemical-engineering major who is the team’s business manager. “At its heart, it’s an electric vehicle that uses top-of-the-line technology, from the batteries to the motor to the communications. It just happens to be solar.”

Quantum is the team’s 11th car since its inception in 1989. Construction started by stripping the previous car, Infinium, to the last bolt and weighing everything. Infinium brought U of M its third consecutive (and sixth overall) victory at the American Solar Challenge last year, but it weighed 500 pounds. The team set out to trim every extraneous ounce from Quantum.

To start, it used modeling software to determine how much stress the car and its components are subjected to. That brought a startling discovery.

“We were significantly over-engineering the car,” Hilger said.

Everything about Infinium was stronger and heavier than necessary. With that in mind, the team set about designing slimmer, lighter parts. No one will say just what Quantum weighs, but the target was 320 pounds.

“It’s very light,” is all Hilger would say.

Secrecy is common in solar racing, a highly competitive sport where a four-day race can come down to minutes. Top teams spend $1 million or more building their cars. U of M is gunning for the defending champions from Tokai University in Japan and the Nuon Solar Team of Delft University, the Dutch team that won the four previous races.

Given the intense competition, Hilger was equally coy discussing the three-wheeler’s drivetrain. Three wheels are the norm in solar racing because they offer less rolling resistance. A hub-mounted motor from the Australian firm CSIro drives the rear wheel, generates “a few horsepower” and is 98 percent efficient.

“It’s one of the most efficient motors in the world,” Hilger said.

Aaron Frantz, a sophomore mechanical-engineering student, helps Santosh Kumar get into Quantum. Kumar, a master’s student in aerospace engineering, is the team’s engineering director. Photo: Scott Soderberg/University of Michigan

The car is covered with 6 square meters 65 square feet of silicon solar cells, somewhere between 600 and 800 in all, and they generate “something less than 2 kilowatts of power,” Hilger said.

“We can cruise at 60 mph on less than 2 kilowatts,” he said.

The car features a lithium-polymer battery to keep things moving when the clouds roll in. Regenerative braking sends energy back to the pack. Hilger wouldn’t say how big a battery Quantum has, but said 5 kilowatt-hours is the norm in solar racing. Everything is bolted to a carbon-fiber monocoque and covered with carbon-fiber bodywork. Major components are aluminum or titanium.

The body was designed with help from Exa Corp., which provided the CFD needed to make the car as slick as possible. Hilger’s keeping mum on the car’s drag coefficient, but top-tier solar racers are in the super-efficient 0.07-to-0.1 range. To put that in perspective, the General Motors EV1 was 0.195, and the current-generation Toyota Prius is 0.25.

The car, which is 16 feet long, 3.5 feet tall and 6 feet wide, ran under its own power for the first time April 8. No one’s put the hammer down yet, but Hilger says Infinium could do 105 mph on a track. That’s well above the 50 to 60 mph the cars average in a race, but it speaks to the level of engineering involved.

Top-level cars like Quantum are exquisitely engineered. The team received help from some of the best engineering firms in the world. The list includes Ricardo, which worked with McLaren to develop the engine in the MP4-12C supercar, and Roush, which has a hand in everything from tuning to NASCAR racing. Each of the Big Three automakers is a sponsor, and they’re very interested in what the team is up to, because a solar car is simply a highly efficient electric vehicle.

“Through working with this team we have access to cutting-edge research that the team is employing, which helps us learn as we develop our own products,” Mark Fields, executive vice president of Ford, told Wired.com. “The technology that the team works with — the lithium-ion batteries, how you manage thermal energy — is hardwired into our electrification strategy going forward.”

The team finished the car months ahead of schedule, leaving plenty of time for fine-tuning. Quantum will compete in the Formula Sun Grand Prix at Indianapolis Motor Speedway next month, where it will be thoroughly shaken down before heading to Australia in October.

“We think we can refine and improve the car by going through it with a fine-tooth comb to shave more weight and find more efficiency,” Hilger said.

Competing Down Under will require more than getting in and mashing the accelerator. Solar races are a marathon, not a sprint, and the defending champs finished the 2009 race in 29 hours, 49 minutes at an average speed of 63 mph. There is a tremendous amount of strategy involved as teams manage their energy and keep an eye on the weather: Michigan’s team includes a meteorologist.

“Being able to predict cloud cover will give you a huge advantage, so you can plan ahead and manage your energy,” said Spencer Quong of of Quong & Associates, an advanced-automotive-engineering consultancy. He founded the UC-Berkeley Solar Vehicle Team in 1990. “But if you have enough sunlight and you can gather more sunlight than you can use, your foot is on the floor.”

You can bet the guy behind the wheel of Quantum will have his foot to the floor. The team is supremely confident of its chances, and determined to bring the trophy home in October.

“I think we have a better chance of winning that we’ve ever had in the past,” Hilger said.

Top photo: Team members AJ Trublowski, Cole Witte (yellow T-shirt), Chris Hilger and Caitlin Sadler (from left) install a temporary top on Quantum. (Scott Soderberg/University of Michigan.)

The team tests Quantum at General Motors’ Medford Proving Grounds. That’s Jonathan Meed with the computer. Driver Ryan Mazur and Gerald Chang (center) are testing the steering wheel. Photo: Scott Soderberg/University of Michigan



Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

31 March
0Comments

Portable GPS Gives Pilots Weather In The Cockpit

A portable GPS is commonplace in cars where drivers are looking for some help with driving around town. For pilots, the small navigation tools have also become very popular, but not only because of the help they provide in finding a destination from 10,000 feet. Real time weather received via satellite is becoming at least as important for many pilots flying longer trips around the country.

Weather has been available in the cockpit for decades, but the displays were usually rather crude and if radar information was desired, the cost was very high and the information was still limited to a scan in front of the aircraft.

Pilots usually had to rely on communication with ground based weather services where a person could relay weather information over the radio. But today, the same small GPS units many of us have in our cars come equipped with weather capabilities that exceeds the most advanced systems from just 10 or 15 years ago available only in bigger aircraft and costing tens of thousands of dollars.

According to a story in Pilot magazine from the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, one retailer reports that 75 percent of portable GPS units sold include satellite weather capability. Many newer aircraft have satellite weather capabilities built into glass panel displays that also include GPS. But these systems cost many thousands of dollars to purchase and are not available for many older aircraft. A portable GPS with weather capability costs less than a thousand dollars and can be carried in any airplane from antiques to business jets.

With in-cockpit weather, pilots of even the smallest airplanes are able to monitor the weather along their route in real time. Being able to watch a developing thunderstorm move across your path, or being able to see areas of potential icing conditions allows pilots to make alternative plans with greater confidence than can be made when relying on radio communication with ground based weather services.

Pilots still tend to check the conditions and forecasts before embarking on a long flight. But once in the air, a picture can be worth a thousand words and satellite weather can save a lot of time and effort compared to trying to listen to those words over the radio.

Photo: Garmin

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

23 January
0Comments

One way to look at the internet, mobile, web and tablets

Nethierarchy

It might be about the size of the screen and whether or not you’re standing up.

Start at the bottom. For the first five years of the Internet, the most used function was email. Email remains a bedrock of every device and system that’s been built on top of the internet, though sometimes it looks like a text message or a mobile check in. This is the layer for asynchronous person to person connection, over time.

Moving from left to right, we see how the way we use the thing we call the internet has evolved over time. We also see how devices and technology and bandwidth have changed the uses of the net and, interestingly, how a growth in mass has led to a growth in self-motivated behavior.

Early online projects were things like Archie and Veronica and checking in changes to the Linux code base. You needed patience, a big screen and a sense of contribution.

Layer on top of this a practice that is getting ever more professional, which is creating content for others to consume. Sometimes in groups, sometimes using sophisticated software and talented cohorts.

As we move to the right (and through time) we see the birth of online shopping. Still to this day, most online shopping happens on traditional devices, often sitting down.

The sitting down part is not a silly aside. Ted Leonsis theorized twenty years ago that the giant difference between TV and the internet was how far you sat from the screen. TV was an 8 foot activity, and you were a consumer. The internet was a 16 inch activity, and you participated. I think the sitting down thing is similar. You’re not going to buy an armoir while standing on the subway.

Moving over in time and device and intent, we see the idea of consuming content. While tablets get their share of shopping, this is where they really shine. I think 2011 is going to be the year of the tablet, from the Kindle to the iPad to the thing we used to call a phone.

It’s in the last two categories that these other devices, things that don’t involve sitting down, are superior, not just a mobile substitute. The social graph is a very low bandwidth, peripheral attention interaction, perfect for this audience and this medium. And the last category–tell me where I am, where to eat, who’s near me, what’s the weather, get me a cab right now–is all about me and now and here.

I don’t believe this is a winner take all situation, any more than one bestselling book makes all other books obsolete. I think different pillars work for different devices, and there will continue to be winners in all of them.

By Seth Godin: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/

Valve Interactive
An online marketing and design agency in Portland Oregon