26 March
0Comments

An Engine As Art In a Thirteen Hour Film

Forget about Bullitt, Ronin and Vanishing Point. There’s a new contender for greatest car movie ever made. It’s called Parts and Labor, and it’s over thirteen hours long.

Instead of Steve McQueen performing multiple stunts, the film stars the engine of a 1982 Volkswagen Rabbit and a pair of greasy hands. Like the still shown above, all the action consists of close ups of the engine being methodically taken apart and put back together again — triple-X rated pornography for the folks over at VW Vortex.

Filmmaker Jesse Cain is both the man behind the camera and the mechanic working on the car, and the project took him over two years. He said he originally wanted to film himself working on an iconic piece of Detroit iron, but chose a broken-down Rabbit since his name was already on its title.

“I decided to be thrifty in the recession environment and fix what I already owned,” Cain said. “The movie is entirely shot with close-ups, each shot composition and duration determined by the size, shape and difficulty of removing or installing each part.” You can watch ten minutes of it in the video clip below.

Cain doesn’t have any illusions about his own abilities as a mechanic, admitting to multiple mistakes he made throughout the process. “It would be fun to sit with an ASE certified mechanic and have him or her critique my work,” he said. “I’m pretty sure there would be some big laughs and horrified cringes at times.”

 

The project started as part of a larger film that Cain had planned, about a boy who fixes a long-neglected car after his family’s home goes into foreclosure. After shooting the scenes with the Rabbit, however, Cain realized the car was the true star.

“I started filming tests of how I imagined the engine scenes would look, and after watching the dailies of these tests I realized that I had already started shooting the film I wanted to make,” he said.

The result was a film that took as long as Cain spent working on the car. “Instead of relying on the usual tricks of filmmaking — jump cuts, time lapse, or simple editing of action — I left the camera rolling and showed the entire process,” he said. “The work involved took me 13 hours, three minutes on camera. It’s kind of a rejection of internet culture and immediacy.”

So far, response has been positive. New York City’s Anthology Film Archives screened Parts and Labor last weekend, offering a special ticket that allowed audience members to come and go as they pleased. The program even touted that the film “out-Warholed Andy.”

“Most people find it very meditative,” Cain said. “It’s very easy to settle into it for a while and become involved in the minutia of the operation. Others say it’s surprisingly riveting. The struggle and success of each shot has its own narrative arc.”

In other words, it’s just like working on a car.

06 March
0Comments

California Lawmaker Wants Rules for Robo-Cars

Photo: Office of Sen. Alex Padilla

California Sen. Alex Padilla has seen the future of driving. It is autonomous, and coming to California.

The senator hopped into one of Google’s self-driving Toyota Prius hybrids on Wednesday for a robo-ride to the capital, where he announced legislation that would formally open California’s roads to autonomous vehicles.

Padilla wants the Golden State to follow the same trail blazed by Nevada, which earlier this month became the first to outline requirements for testing autonomous vehicles on public roads. Padilla believes California, with its thriving tech sector, is the perfect testbed for such technology.

“California is uniquely positioned to be a global leader in this field,” he said.

 

Google, which has racked up more than 200,000 miles with its fleet of autonomous Toyotas, and others argue self-driving cars will increase safety, ease congestion and generally make the stop-and-go slog less of a hassle.

“The vast majority of vehicle accidents are due to human error,” Padilla said, repeating a common refrain heard from advocates of the technology. “Through the use of computers, sensors and other systems, an autonomous vehicle is capable of analyzing the driving environment more quickly and operating a vehicle more safely.”

California does not specifically bar autonomous vehicles from public roads, but neither does it regulate them. For that reason, Padilla’s legislation does not “legalize” autonomous vehicles, which already have been roaming California roads. Rather, SB 1298 directs the California Highway Patrol to adopt safety standards and performance requirements to ensure the safe operation and testing of such automobiles.

Several automakers are pursuing autonomous technology, and some of their work is being done in California. Volkswagen, for example, worked closely with Stanford University through the Volkswagen Electronic Research Lab to develop cars for the DARPA Grand Challenge autonomous vehicle races. And Audi worked with Stanford to develop Shelley, an autonomous TTS that scaled Pikes Peak.

Padilla’s legislation, introduced Friday, “seeks to avoid interrupting these activities while at the same time creating appropriate rules intended to ensure that the testing and operation of autonomous vehicles in the state are conducted in a safe manner.”

The big question, of course, is what defines an autonomous vehicle? Many cars feature semi-autonomous tech like adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning and even self-parking and pedestrian avoidance tech.

None of that qualifies as autonomous tech under Padilla’s bill. The legislation specifically defines “autonomous vehicle” as “a motor vehicle that uses computers, sensors, and other technology and devices that enable the vehicle to safely operate without the active control and continuous monitoring of a human operator.”

That was exactly the experience Padilla said he had Wednesday in Google’s car.

“It was pretty amazing when Google’s vehicle went into self-driving mode,” he said. “The drive was smooth and safe. It worked flawlessly.”

 

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

27 January
0Comments

The ‘Check Engine’ Light Should Be Banned

Editor’s note: Jalopnik has started a petition urging the White House to require that automakers replace the “check engine” light with a display that tells you exactly what’s wrong. Here’s why.

By Jason Torchinsky, Jalopnik

It’s pretty easy to dismiss the “check engine” light as stupid, because it is. I suppose if you thought the smoke coming from under your hood had something to do with the floor mats, then, sure, the check engine light is handy. Beyond that, though, it is useless.

 

But that’s not the real problem. The real problem is that the check engine light is a tool for the propagation of consumer ignorance about their cars. That is why it needs to die. Now.

If it sounds like I’m making a big deal out of this, it’s because I am. The continued use of a generic, uninformative check engine keeps car owners in the dark about the condition of their vehicle and ensures they stay dependent upon and subordinate to car dealers and mechanics.

What’s so frustrating is it doesn’t have to be that way.

 

Let’s look at exactly what the check engine light does in a car, and how it works. To understand it, first we need to understand On-Board Diagnostics (OBD).

Every car sold today has an on-board computer system that monitors the myriad sensors in the drivetrain and reports errors. This has its roots, of all places, in the 1969 Volkswagen Type III, one of the first cars with electronic fuel injection. The “electronic” part was a crude computer that managed the system and scanned for errors. Other manufacturers soon had their own systems, and by 1996 a standardized system called OBD-II was mandated by law in all cars sold in the United States.

OBD-II is a terrific system. What’s not to like about a global standard with standardized connectors and codes to help diagnose problems?

What’s not to like is what happens when something goes wrong.

When your check engine light comes on, you need a scanner to know why. Lame. Photo: Jason Alley/Flickr

At that point, the only thing the average motorist sees is a pictogram of an engine, often bisected by a lightning bolt. And all that tells them is, essentially, nothing. The check engine light is the MIL (Malfunction Indicator Light) of the OBD-II system, and it illuminates whenever a fault is detected. To determine exactly what that fault is, you need a scanner that plugs into the OBD-II port. Dealerships and mechanics have them of course, and so do some shadetree mechanics and car enthusiasts. You also can use a cables to connect a laptop, smartphone or other device with the appropriate software. But the people who do that are not the people who need to worry about a check engine light.

It’s everyone else who has to worry about a check engine light, and everyone else who is so often held hostage to it.

My mom, for example, is never going to connect her laptop to the OBD-II connector under the dash in her Volkswagen Passat. It’s hard enough explaining to her how to connect a printer to her Mac. The check engine light is all but meaningless to her. But if her Passat had a display that indicated the specific error code and explained it, she would at least have an idea what was going on.

As it is, cars could, right now, do more than throw an error code at you. Cars have an advanced self-diagnosis system, but the results are not available to vehicle owners. You’ve got to pay a dealership or mechanic for those error codes and an explanation of what they mean.

This is absurd.

Early on, when sophisticated in-dash displays were rare, you could understand why cars didn’t simply display the error codes as they happened. But today almost every new car has some sort of alphanumeric display that could show the OBD code and a short description of the problem. Why does no one do this?

There’s no good reason not to do it. By failing to provide this information to consumers, regular drivers — that is to say, those who aren’t going to ferret out the codes themselves, and then fix the problem — are beholden to dealerships and mechanics for information readily available in a product they’ve paid for.

Information is power, and by denying you this information, automakers are denying you power. If you’re driving along and that damned check engine light comes on, you have no way of knowing if it’s a minor problem — the gas cap is loose, for example — or you’re at risk of imminent engine failure. A generic check engine light also makes it easier for dishonest mechanics to take advantage of unknowing customers.

Given all of the automobile features that are mandated by law, wouldn’t adding another that actually helps consumers make sense? Hell — a detailed OBD display may be the only mandated feature that makes sense.

That is why we need a federal mandate requiring the generic check engine light be replaced with a dashboard display providing OBD-II codes and a basic description of them. The only rational reasons this hasn’t happened range from (at best) a desire by manufacturers to keep costs as low as possible to (at worst) a deliberate campaign of forced ignorance to maintain dealership profit streams.

Our cars should tell us exactly what’s happening under the hood, even if we have to yell at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to make it happen. I’ll stand outside a supermarket collecting signatures if that’s what it takes to make this happen.

Do it for my mother — and yours.

Photo: kevin yezbick/Flickr

 

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

08 December
0Comments

The Autonomous Electric Mail Truck of Tomorrow

In the future, electric mail trucks will follow postal carriers like well-trained puppies.

Volkswagen, which already envisions a world where we drive super-sexy diesel hybrids that get 261 mpg, teamed up with Deutsche Post to reinvent the lowly mail truck.

What they’ve come up with is a boxy autonomous van with hub motors and, of course, an iPad dock because, well, every cool concept must have an iPad dock, right? Teasing aside, the goal was to create a small, maneuverable truck suited to urban environments.

“We also set out to design a very emotionally appealing commercial vehicle,” Dr. Jürgen Leohold, head of Volkswagen Group Research, said in a statement. To that end, VW’s engineers joined the University of Art at Braunschweig in looking “towards the future from the past.”

Not the distant past, mind you, because the eT! — Volkswagen’s concept car crew is enamored with exclamation points — looks a lot like the current-generation T5 transporter sold in Europe. Still, it’s much more handsome than the trucks the United States Postal Service is driving.

The coolest thing about the truck is the autonomous system VW envisions. Such technology would, VW says, “optimize the logistics of delivery.” VW goes on to say the vehicle “can follow the delivery person from house to house (“Follow me”), or the car can return to the delivery person on command (“Come to me”) – driverless!”

This being a “what if” concept, there are of course no specs or details. But there’s nothing about the truck that couldn’t be built, given Volkswagen’s promise to bring us the electric Golf and electric Up! in 2013. Even the autonomous system isn’t that outlandish, given that Audi built an autonomous TTS that scaled Pikes Peak and Google’s driverless cars are roaming California.

Still, don’t look for these bringing you your Zappos order anytime soon.

“Naturally, the eT! is not a vehicle which – unlike the Golf or up! with an electric motor – could become available very soon,” Rudolf Krebs, VW’s head of electric traction, said in a statement. “But we must make plans today for what the world of lightweight commercial vehicles might look like starting in the second half of this decade, including with regard to electrical drives.”

Photos: Volkswagen

 

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

08 July
0Comments

VW Adds An Autopilot, But Says Keep Your Eyes On The Road

Researchers at Volkswagen have joined the growing list of teams working on autonomous vehicles. Now, as part of a demonstration project, they’ve converted a Passat to drive with minimal driver supervision.

Volkswagen’s system is called Temporary Auto Pilot (TAP) and uses a series of cameras and sensors to control the vehicle at speeds upwards of 80 mph. The system combines and refines existing semi-autonomous features such as lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control into a single program that accelerates, brakes and steers. It differs from previous VW autonomous vehicles such as Stanley, famous for its role in the DARPA Challenge, in that it still requires driver supervision and made of mostly production-ready components.

“What we have achieved today is an important milestone on the path towards accident-free driving,” said Volkswagen Group research president Dr. Jürgen Leohold. When engaged, TAP signals the vehicle to maintain a speed consistent with traffic and speed limits, while steering within lane markers and braking as needed.

Though it’s an impressive achievement, we’ve never heard an automaker claim that an autonomous vehicle is ready to replace a human driver, and VW is no exception.

“Nonetheless, the driver always retains driving responsibility and is always in control,” Leohold said. “The driver can override or deactivate the system at any time and must continually monitor it.” In other words, don’t take a nap or make a phone call while the car is in motion, because any accident is your responsibility.

We’ve driven plenty of cars with active cruise control, and have been shocked to see how our minds immediately begin to engage in other tasks as soon as a computer takes over the safety-critical functions of driving. It’s human nature to stop paying attention to events that aren’t of immediate concern, so we’re curious how VW plans to keep drivers actively controlling their cars.

The whole project is part of the EU’s HAVEit (Highly Automated Vehicles for Intelligent Transport) project, which first began in February 2008.

Photo: Volkswagen

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

31 January
1Comment

VW’s 261-MPG Plug-In Hybrid Arrives in 2013

Volkswagen says the 261-mpg diesel-electric XL1 concept could see limited — very limited — production within two years.

The Germans unveiled the super-efficient Volkswagen XL1 at the Qatar auto show today, showcasing some of its most forward-thinking technology with a promise to offer the car in small numbers.

“We want to go into series production with this car starting in 2013,” VW Chairman Ferdinand Piëch told Automotive News Europe.

VW boss Martin Winterkorn said the car will be offered in Germany first, then throughout Europe. The United States and China “will follow at a later date,” he said.

We’ve heard this before, of course.

The XL1 is the most practical and refined of the company’s 1-liter cars, so named because the goal was to develop a car capable of traveling 100 kilometers on a liter of fuel (roughly 235 mpg). It is the third iteration of a project launched in 2002.

It features a 48-horsepower two-cylinder diesel engine displacing just 800 cc. It’s bolted to a seven-speed DSG gearbox and mated to a 27-horsepower electric motor drawing power from a lithium-ion battery of undisclosed size. The plug-in hybrid has an electric range of 21 miles and fuel consumption of just 0.9 liters per 100 kilometers, which comes to 261 mpg by our math. It emits 24 grams of CO2 per kilometer — compared to the 89 grams emitted by the Toyota Prius.

All that hardware is wrapped in carbon-fiber polymer bodywork attached to a carbon-fiber monocoque. Extensive use of aluminum, magnesium and other exotic materials keeps the weight to just 1,700 pounds.

When VW unveiled 1-liter cars in the past, it said the car could be built by 2012 or so. But cost has always been the limiting factor — these cars are chock-full of expensive technology and even more expensive materials.

But Piëch tells Automotive News that costs have come down significantly, making production feasible. For example, the carbon fiber body of the first-gen 1L car cost 35,000 euros (about $47,000). The body for the XL1 cost 5,000 euros (about $6,800). VW expects the lithium-ion battery to cost 250 to 300 euros ($410) by 2013.

That said, no one at VW would say what the XL1 will cost if and when it sees production. Ulrich Hackenberg, director of development for VW, said production could be limited to 100 vehicles to start.

It’s safe to say the car won’t be cheap, especially at volumes that low. But then this car almost certainly isn’t meant for the mass market. It will be a halo car, intended to show what is possible and showcase some of VW’s most advanced technologies and materials.

In that regard, it will be much like the Chevrolet Volt and Nissan Leaf (and the amazing Porsche 918 plug-in hybrid, if it’s built) — cars with a small initial market but the potential to influence many subsequent models.

For example, the XL1’s drivetrain is a natural for the VW Polo since the two vehicles are roughly the same size. And it isn’t hard to imagine the XL1’s carbon polymer bodywork being used on the Audi eTron electric vehicle, or the R8 for that matter.

Although Winterkorn said the XL1’s initial production run will be “small,” Piech said the cars definitely will be offered for sale and not limited to test fleets or demonstration programs.

Images: Volkswagen

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

28 January
0Comments

Sexy Futuristic VW Diesel-Electric Gets 261 MPG

The mad scientists at Volkswagen have wheeled out a bullet-shaped diesel-electric plug-in hybrid that gets a stunning 261 mpg. VW claims it is the most fuel-efficient hybrid ever, and it shows what’s possible when you let your engineers run wild.

It is with supreme irony that the Germans will unveil the XL1 concept car at the Qatar Motor Show this week. The car, the latest in the company’s ongoing experiments with ultra-efficient vehicles, was born of the simple question, “Just how much could the energy consumption of cars be reduced if all the stops were pulled out for efficiency?”

This is a question Volkswagen chairman Dr. Ferdinand Piëch posed to his engineers almost a decade ago, and one automakers around the world are grappling with as they face tightening fuel economy and emissions regulations.

Piëch challenged his team to build a car capable of going 100 kilometers on a single liter of fuel — the equivalent of 235 mpg. VW’s been at it ever since, turning out concepts with stellar fuel economy but less-than-stellar practicality. The XL1 is the latest project, the one you’d most likely want to live with and the one most likely to see production.

“When the new millennium was ushered in, Prof. Dr. Ferdinand Piëch formulated the visionary goal of bringing to the market a production car that was practical for everyday use with a fuel consumption of 1.0 liter per 100 km,” the company said in a statement. “In the new XL1, Volkswagen is demonstrating that this goal is now within reach.”

The Volkswagen One-Liter concept got 235 mpg.

The XL1 is the most practical and refined of the so-called One-Liter cars. The first, the Volkswagen One-Liter Car, was a tandem two-seater that looked a bit like a Tylenol. It was a technological marvel when it appeared in 2002, with lots of carbon fiber, magnesium and other exotic materials. Power came from a tiny diesel engine good for 235 mpg. Efficient, yes, but completely impractical because it was absurdly expensive. Still, Piëch was confident the cost of the technology, and the exotic materials it featured, would tumble, and he suggested the car might see production by 2012.

The Volkswagen L1 Concept, being unveiled at the Frankfurt Auto Show in 2009.

Then came the Volkswagen L1 Concept, a definite step forward when it was unveiled in 2009. It was more refined, with a diesel-electric hybrid drivetrain. It was a little bigger than the One-Liter, with more power, superior performance and increased roominess. It wasn’t so futuristic, but still a bold redefinition of the term “car.” It was good for 1.38 l/100 km, which comes to 170.4 mpg. VW claimed the L1 emits just 36 grams per kilometer of carbon dioxide. For the sake of comparison, the 2010 Toyota Prius emits 89 g/km.

And now we come to the XL1.

The coolest thing about this car is the drivetrain. The diesel-electric combo features a two-cylinder TDI engine with a displacement of just 0.8 liters. It’s essentially the company’s ubiquitous 1.6-liter engine cut in half, and it’s bolted to a seven-speed DSG gearbox. The engine is good for 48 horsepower and 88 pound-feet of torque.

The electric drivetrain sports a 20 kilowatt (27 horsepower) electric motor that draws power from a lithium-ion battery of undisclosed size. It’s a plug-in hybrid, and VW says the XL1 can go 35 kilometers (21 miles) in electricity alone.

This combination provides remarkable efficiency. Fuel economy is pegged at 0.9 liters per 100 kilometers, which comes to 261 mpg by our math. Emissions are just 24 grams of CO2 per kilometer. More remarkably, VW says the 1,700-pound XL1 can cruise at 62 mph on just 8.4 horsepower. That’s about half what the Golf TDI requires. Under electric power, the car needs less than 0.1 kilowatt-hour to go one kilometer.

Stomp on it and the electric motor assists the diesel engine in accelerating, and VW says the XL1 will do zero to 60 in 11.9 seconds. Top speed is limited to 100 mph.

The XL1 differs from its siblings in that it offers side-by-side seating, a nod to increased practicality. It’s also got proper doors instead of jet-like canopy. It’s still made of high-tech stuff including carbon fiber polymer parts attached to a Formula 1-style carbon fiber monocoque. That’s expensive stuff, but VW says it’s making progress bringing costs down through a patented production process it calls advanced resin transfer molding.

All told the car weighs about what a first-gen Honda CR-X HF weighed. There’s a lot of aluminum under the carbon-fiber bodywork, including the suspension components, brake calipers, shocks and other components. Other tasty bits include carbon fiber anti-roll bars, ceramic brake rotors and magnesium wheels.

This is one super-slick car, with a drag coefficient of 0.186 and a frontal area of 1.5 square meters. That makes it more aerodynamic than the General Motors EV1 but not quite so slippery as the Aptera Motors 2e. The car is 12.7 feet long and 5.4 feet wide, roughly the size of a VW Polo. It’s just 3.7 feet tall — roughly the same as the Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder.

Volkswagen has long hinted we could see a car based on a One-Liter model in showrooms, and it said something based on the L1 Concept shown 2009 might be available in 2013. But it seems unlikely we’ll see anything resembling this car anytime soon given the exotic (and expensive) materials and outlandish styling (which, frankly, we love). It’s more likely that we’ll see some of the technology underpinning the XL1 in production models as VW, like everyone else, scrambles to increase the fuel efficiency of its lineup.

Plug-in diesel hybrid Polo, anyone?

Images: Volkswagen

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

Valve Interactive
An online marketing and design agency in Portland Oregon