02 August
0Comments

Watch: A Speech-Jamming Gun That Shuts Up Loud Mouths

We’ve all suffered through a lunch, date, or meeting with a monologist–you know, a person who, oblivious to social cues, dominates the conversation, shows little interest in others around the table, and, when someone tries to shove in one’s oar, raises his voice to drown out the hope of a dialogue.

The question is, how to call out the offender on his obnoxious behavior when you can’t get a word in edgewise? One way is to throw his words back at him. Two Japanese researchers have created a gunlike instrument that does just that. Using the principle of delayed audio feedback, their SpeechJammer records speech and plays it back with a split-second pause, effectively stupefying and silencing the speaker.

Kazutaka Kurihara, a researcher at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, thought up the idea after participating in a demonstration of delayed audio feedback at a local museum. “When I spoke to a microphone, my voice came back to me after a few hundred millisecond delay, then I could not continue to speak anymore,” Kurihara tells Co.Design. “Around that time, my research interest was about developing a system that controls appropriate turn-taking at discussions and was looking for technologies to enforce some discussion rules for participants. Then I came up with the gun type SpeechJammer idea utilizing DAF. That’s the destiny.” He recruited his friend, Koji Tsukada, a “gadget master” at Ochanomizu University, to help him realize the concept, consisting of a direction-sensitive mic and speaker, a distance sensor, a laser pointer, and a microcontroller.

Kurihara stresses that the intent isn’t only to shut up blabbermouths but to allow space for the less vocal to join the conversation. “Fair discussions are essential for resolving conflicts through communication,” he and Tsukada write in their paper. “However, some people tend to lengthen their turns or deliberately interrupt other people when it is their turn in order to establish their presence rather than achieve more fruitful discussions.” SpeechJammer was conceived to correct such abuses and allow all participants to have an equal say in proceedings.

The technology behind the idea might be overkill: Under ordinary circumstances, thrusting a mic-equipped gun into a person’s face should be enough to throw anyone off his game. But in the case of, say, the upcoming presidential debates, we can imagine it being an entirely effective (and somewhat hilarious) way to impose time restrictions.

Image: Everett Collection/Shutterstock

Via FastCoDesign: http://www.fastcodesign.com/

24 July
0Comments

A Must-See Tribute To Pop-Art Hero Roy Lichtenstein

Ohhh…Alright…Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Ohhh…Alright…, 1964. Oil and Magna on canvas. 91.4 x 96.5 cm (36 x 38 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Private Collection.

Alka Seltzer

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Alka Seltzer, 1966. Graphite and lithographic rubbing crayon pochoir, with scraping, on cream wove paper, fixed. 76.2 x 55.9 cm (30 x 22 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Art Institute of Chicago, Margaret Fisher Endowment.

Artist’s Studio No. 1

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Artist’s Studio No. 1 (Look Mickey), 1973. Oil, Magna, sand with aluminum powder and Magna medium on canvas. 243.8 x 325.1 cm (96 x 128 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Collection Walker Art Center, Minneapolis. Gift of Judy and Kenneth Dayton and the T.B. Walker Foundation, 1981.

Ball of Twine

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Ball of Twine, 1963. Magna on canvas. 172.7 x 91.4 cm (40 x 36 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Christie’s.

Brushstroke with Spatter

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Brushstroke with Spatter, 1966. Oil and Magna on canvas. 121.9 x 152.4 cm (68 x 80 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Art Institute of Chicago, Barbara Neff Smith and Solomon Byron Smith Purchase Fund.

Haystack

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Haystack, 1969. Oil on canvas. 45.7 x 61 cm (18 x 24 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. The Ruben Family.

Haystacks

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Haystacks, 1969. Oil and Magna on canvas. 40.6 x 61 cm (16 x 24 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. The Ruben Family.

Hot Dog with Mustard

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Hot Dog with Mustard, 1963. Oil on canvas. 45.7 x 121.9 cm (18 x 48 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Aaron I. Fleischman.

Keds

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Keds, 1961. Oil on canvas. 123.2 x 88.3 cm (48.5 x 34.75 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. The Robert B. Mayer Family Collection, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Landscape in Fog

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Landscape in Fog, 1996. Oil and Magna on canvas. 180.3 x 207.6 cm (71 x 81.75 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Private Collection.

Laocoön

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Laocoön, 1988. Oil and Magna on canvas. 304.8 x 259.1 cm (120 x 102 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Private Collection.

Look Mickey

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Look Mickey, 1961. Oil on canvas. 121.9 x 175.3 cm (48 x 69 in). © National Gallery of Art. The National Gallery of Art. Dorothy and Roy Lichtenstein, Gift of the artist, in Honor of the 50th Anniversary of the National Gallery.

Masterpiece

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Masterpiece, 1962. Oil on canvas. 137.2 x 137.2 cm (54 x 54 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Agnes Gund Collection, New York.

Nude with Street Scene

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Nude with Street Scene, 1995. Oil on Magna on canvas. 121.9 x 171.5 cm (48 x 67 1/2 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Collection Simonyi.

Oh, Jeff...I Love You, Too...But…

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Oh, Jeff…I Love You, Too…But…, 1964. Oil and Magna on canvas. 121.9 x 121.9 cm (48 x 48 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Collection Simonyi.

Sunrise

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Sunrise, 1965. Oil and Magna on canvas. 91.4 x 172.7 cm (36 x 68 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Private Collection.

The Ring (Engagement)

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). The Ring (Engagement), 1962. Oil on canvas. 121.9 x 177.8 cm (48 x 70 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Stefan T. Edlis Collection.

Untitled

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Untitled, 1959. Oil on canvas. 86.5 x 71.3 cm (34.0625 x 28.0625 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Private Collection..

Wall Explosion II

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Wall Explosion II, 1965. Porcelain enamel on steel 170.2 x 188 cm x 10.2 cm (67 x 74 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Tate: Purchased 1980. Photo ©Tate, 2011.

Whaam!

Roy Lichtenstein, American (1923-1997). Whaam!, 1963. Magna and oil on canvas. 172.7 x 406.4 cm (68 x 160 in). © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. Tate: Purchased 1966. Photo ©Tate, 2011.

Via FastCoDesign: http://www.fastcodesign.com/

16 April
0Comments

Announcing The Top 25 In Our Porsche Next Design Challenge (Part 1)

We couldn’t know that Ferdinand Porsche, the 911′s designer, would pass away even as we were getting entries in our call for designs inspired by 911. But perhaps it was a fitting tribute that we got over 400 entries, picking out details of the 911 that you’d have to be a true fan to notice. His designs inspired a fervor that few designers ever have. As the AP reported when the latest 911 was introduced: “The new version was mobbed and groped when it was unveiled in September at the Frankfurt auto show. Showgoers left the doors and roof smeared with fingerprints as they scrambled for a chance to sit behind the wheel.” All that, while remaining true to the lines and spirit that Porsche originally laid out. Ferdinand Porsche created a true design classic.

R.I.P. Ferdinand Porsche, 1935-2012. At work in 1968.

So I’ll admit that I was a bit terrified by the entire prospect of our Porsche Next Design Challenge. Initially, the plan was to have an invitational design competition: We’d invite only a few top designers whose work we trusted, and have them riff on products inspired by the 911. But that didn’t seem right. We figured: Who’d want to see a bunch of design hot shots get even more attention? It seemed a far better idea to engage you, our readers, and invite you to do the designing.

The only problem was that we had no idea what we’d get. Would the entries be embarrassing? Would there be anything good? It was a bit of a gamble. And one that I’m happy to say paid off, because the entries you guys submitted were superb. These ranged from a razor that looks like a Porsche’s gas pedal to a ski helmet inspired by the orange 911 pictured in our first post about the contest.

So here they are: The first 12 of the Top 25. We’ll announce the rest next week, and as I type this, our panel of judges–Dror Benshetrit, Jens Martin Skibsted, and Grant Larson, Porsche’s current chief exterior designer–is combing over those entries, to determine a Top 7, which we will announce soon. (The slides you see above are presented in no particular order.) After that, entrants will get a chance to refine their designs and then we’ll announce a winner. (The Top 7 will each receive $1,500. The winner will get a one-year lease on a 911 or $20,000.) Thank you to everyone who entered, and thank you for reading! Enjoy the work above.

Image of F.A. Porsche: Porsche via European Pressphoto Agency

Via FastCoDesign: http://www.fastcodesign.com/

26 January
0Comments

Marketing Emergency: Nobody’s Making Content Worth Reading

How can I go about teaching enterprise, and their B2B marketers, how to produce better content? This is a real marketing emergency, if there is such a thing.

Have you looked at the number of white papers out there lately? And how they all suck? At the collateral? At the websites? At the press releases and the fatuous corporate blogs? At the 178 social media sites per company–few of which offer much relevance or are of interest to customers, shareholders, suppliers, or even employees. Enterprise writing does not “go viral.”

There are better things to do with time and money than produce content no one will read or see. “Content marketing” is king, but not if you create the wrong content, or bad content.

I ask myself, can I help more by writing for them, or by teaching them how to write themselves? And is that even possible? As a professor years ago, I saw that by the time people got to my classes, their ability to write had been more or less fixed by the amount they read as children and the amount of encouragement they received in elementary school.

With all the time I spend at startups, I realize young companies are much better communicators and marketers than enterprise companies. They have to be. They have to get and keep customers, or they die. In the enterprise, approaching death is often non-obvious. Kodak. (Squirrel.)

Long, long ago, when I was teaching English, I belonged to a group in the National Council of Teachers of English called the Committee on Public Doublespeak. We professors were committed to wiping out jargon, bullshit, unclear writing, and all the ways people obfuscate rather than clarify.

Thirty years later, I look around me and the amount of content has proliferated, but the quality of it has gotten even worse. About five years ago, Chelsea Hardaway wrote a book called Why Business People Speak Like Idiots, addressing the same problem.

Yet B2B marketers have long discussions about whether they should be doing more or less SEO, more or less inbound or outbound marketing, more or less “earned media.” This discussion is the proverbial arranging of the Titanic’s deck chairs.

How much of what you do is never important. The quality, and relevance, of what you do is important. Every enterprise company should pretend to be a startup.

Image: Flickr user bburky

Via Fast Company: http://www.fastcompany.com

13 January
0Comments

Nuke the Net: How to Get the Mainstream Talking About the Dangers of SOPA

If you’re like most Mashable readers, you know plenty about the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and its sister bill in the Senate, the Protect IP Act (PIPA). And you’re probably plenty outraged about it, too. And rightfully so.

If enacted, SOPA/PIPA could have disastrous consequences for the basic infrastructure of the Internet. It would afford the Federal government and copyright holders excessive and far-reaching powers to take down sites they deem to be hosting protected content with little regard for the definition of “hosting.”

If a user of a news site leaves a comment with offending material, that could be grounds for a takedown. And YouTube could be in hot water should it fail to promptly detect a user who uploads copyrighted material. The same problem exists for all community-based websites, which, let’s face it, are the vast majority of our favorite sites.

It’s the punitive actions which SOPA/PIPA call for that are the most troubling aspect of the bills. They take an offending website off the Domain Name System (DNS), a sort of phone book for the Internet. For more on DNS, watch this excellent explainer video posted on The Guardian. By interfering with DNS, the bill could destabilize the foundation of the Internet. And dedicated pirates would find work-arounds.

 

 


Two Different Media Conversations


If you agree with my anti-SOPA stance, then let me assure you, we are in good company. We stand alongside the likes of Google, Facebook, AOL, Wikipedia, Reddit, Mozilla and a host of other giants in the tech industry.

But there’s work to be done. We know plenty about SOPA/PIPA because we’re so active on websites and online communities that are paying attention to the issue.

But what about the rest of America? What about your parents, your mailman and your co-workers? They may use the Internet as much as we do, but in very different capacities.

We sometimes think SOPA/PIPA has been part of the national dialogue for months, but it hasn’t. It’s only been a part of the dialogue in niche networks, communities and media sites.

Simply put, it’s not a mainstream issue yet. But it deserves to be.

If SOPA/PIPA are passed, it wouldn’t just mean disaster for us. It could severely disrupt the services that casual Internet users enjoy as well. And they represent a much larger swath of America. If we want to fight SOPA/PIPA, we need to educate and inform those casual users as best we can.

So far, mainstream media have been largely silent on the twin Internet killers.

And our elected officials in Congress? Most don’t understand the complexity of the Internet. Rep. Mel Watts (D-NC) said during a markup session that he “didn’t understand a lot of the technological stuff,” and that he’s “not the person to argue about the technology part of this.” Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) said that it’s time to “bring in the nerds” – which Congress is thankfully doing.

It all echoes the late Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens’ remark that the Internet is a “series of tubes.”

Suggestions and amendments proposed by the seemingly few Congressman who do understand the Internet, like Colorado Rep. Jared Polis (an Internet entrepreneur), have sadly been getting shot down by their less-knowledgeable peers.


The Power of the Big Three


So how can the issues surrounding SOPA and PIPA reach the national discourse?

Some sites, including Reddit, Tumblr, Mozilla and others, have already censored parts of their websites in protest of the bills. Reddit is going a step further and replacing their normal website with an anti-SOPA message for a full 12 hours in late January.

That’s a good start, but there’s a problem with that approach. Those sites are most often visited by people like you and me, who are already in the know about SOPA/PIPA. We need massive, coordinated action on sites that casual Internet users visit.

Facebook, Google and Wikipedia. You’re the Big Three in this fight. You’ve already publicly affirmed your opposition to SOPA. Now it’s time to really be a part of the fight.

If you go dark for even a few hours, everyone will take notice — Internet aficionados and casual users alike. The effect would be increased exponentially if you coordinated the effort. And what’s there to lose? Some ad revenue? If you really believe what you’ve written about SOPA, that’s nothing compared to the consequences the bill could have. Consider any lost revenue your charitable donation to the cause, because the other side has some seriously big money behind it. You’re the dominant players in your field, and you won’t lose users over such a campaign.

Go dark. Shut down your sites. Leave a message about SOPA/PIPA, link out to more information and let people know what they can do to fight the bills.

Imagine a casual Internet user who hops on Facebook in the morning to browse his News Feed. On blackout day, he’ll see something radically different. And he’ll instantly take notice. He’ll start talking to friends, family and co-workers.

“Did you see what Google did?” asks one to another. “Yeah, Facebook too. It was about some bill in Congress,” responds the other. And the conversation begins.

Once public interest starts to mount, understanding will follow. The outrage that feels commonplace amongst Internet natives will spread to casual users and public pressure will build, forcing Congress to take a second, much deeper, look at SOPA/PIPA.

Should these companies be unable to stomach even a short outage, a prominent banner at the top of each website would probably suffice. But that wouldn’t nearly have the same impact.

You need to pull out the big guns in this fight. The Internet is an incredible thing and the online community powerful when it unites around an issue. But this issue needs to enter the mainstream. And blacking out the Big Three are the way to do just that.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

06 January
0Comments

Censorship: Belarus Makes Certain Web Behaviors Illegal

belarus imageA new law in Belarus will restrict access to foreign websites, and will require Internet cafes and clubs to report users who visit forbidden pages.

The Eastern European country’s law (Improvements to the Usage of the National Segment of the Internet, law number 317-3), goes into effect Friday — censorship making it illegal to conduct ecommerce with Belarusian citizens through sites outside the country’s .by domain name.

All companies and individuals registered as entrepreneurs in Belarus must use the national portal for conducting business, providing services and exchanging email, explains the Library of Congress in an online post. That means citizens are restricted from buying from Amazon or the Apple Store, and selling on eBay, among many other sites.

The law’s restrictions don’t stop without banning “extremist” and “pornographic” sites.

Citizens caught breaking the new law — as well as those providing Internet connection to people breaking the law — can be punished with fines of up to 1 million Belarus rubles (about $125) by the tax authorities, police and secret police.

Both the U.S. and the UK have condemned President Alexander Lukashenko’s repression of his political opponents, restricted travel to the country, and frozen assets channeled to the government, the BBC reports.

Do you think Belarus is helping its economy by keeping ecommerce on its own domain sites or is it hurting itself by restricting foreign business?

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, selensergen

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

11 December
0Comments

Hybrids Can Save Gas — and Lives

Hybrids can save gas. They also can save lives.

Gas-electric vehicles tend to be more effective than their conventional counterparts when it comes to shielding occupants from injury, according to the Highway Loss Data Institute. On average, the your odds of being injured in a crash are 25 percent lower in a hybrid.

Why? Because hybrid vehicles weigh more. Although hybrids share the same dimensions as their gas-swilling sisters, the battery, motor and electronics provide greater mass. A Toyota Highlander Hybrid, for example, weighs 330 pounds more than the gasoline version. All things being equal, heavier cars fare better than lighter ones in a crash.

“Weight is a big factor,” Matt Moore, Institute v.p. and author of the report, said in a statement. “Hybrids on average are 10 percent heavier than their standard counterparts. This extra mass gives them an advantage in crashes that their conventional twins don’t have.”

There are other factors at play, including when, how and by whom hybrids are driven. The Institute included controls to minimize the impact of such variables. At the bottom line, the Institute says, the findings show consumers don’t have to trade safety for fuel efficiency.

The institute analyzed more than 25 hybrid models with conventional counterparts, all of them 2003 to 2011 models. The Toyota Prius and Honda Insight were not included because they are hybrid-specific models.

There is a downside, however. A separate analysis by the Institute found hybrids may be as much as 20 percent more likely to injure pedestrians. The problem is pedestrians don’t always hear the hybrids coming. It’s a common complaint, one the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is working to address.

Photo: General Motors

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

24 October
0Comments

Private Space Companies Gather Momentum

This week marks the seventh anniversary of the X-Prize winning flight of SpaceShipOne. Brian Binnie’s 24 minute flight to more than 367,000 feet captured the world’s imagination and put a spotlight on the opportunity of private space flight. In the years since there have been some delays, but training for flights has already started even though a specific flight schedule has not been announced.

For those planning on a sub-orbital flight in Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShipTwo, one of the first steps is going through centrifuge and high altitude training to prepare for the g-forces that will be experienced during the flight as well as learning about the effects of very thin air on the body.

The practice sessions take place at the National AeroSpace Training and Research center near Philidelphia. According to a story in Aviation Week & Space Technology, the center has provided SpaceShipTwo simulations to would be passengers, and is just one of the signs that the private space continues to grow. The center can also replicate launching from an Atlas V rocket.

Beyond the space tourists Virgin Galactic has signed up for SpaceShipTwo flights, there is also excitement in the commercial space delivery arena. Elon Musk’s SpaceX has been given the go ahead to combine the final two test flights of its Dragon spacecraft into a single mission. This will allow the SpaceX team to dock with the International Space Station on its next flight, after a rehearsal ‘mock docking’ where the spacecraft will approach the ISS but not actually dock. Both events will take place on the same flight.

Musk also announced recently that SpaceX is working towards making the Falcon rocket system used for launch a fully reusable system.

“I wasn’t sure it could be solved, for a while,” Musk said at the National Press Club in Washignton D.C., “but then I think just relatively recently — probably in the last 12 months or so — I’ve come to the conclusion that it can be solved and I think SpaceX is going to try to do it.”

Making the launch system full reusable would mean the main recurring cost of a launch would be around $200,000 for the propellant. Musk believes if a $50-60 million rocket could be reused a thousand times, the cost of a launch could be reduced to just $50,000.

The SpaceX launch was expected to happen next month, but with the recent loss of a Soyuz rocket and payload bound for the ISS, the Falcon rocket launch has been put on hold.

Virgin Galactic continues flight testing of SpaceShipTwo with the 16th glide flight taking place last week. Powered flights are expected to begin soon and Virgin has said it hopes to begin passenger flights as early as late next year.

Photo: Virgin Galactic

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

25 August
0Comments

Apple Outselling Lenovo in China, AT&T Nixes Limited Texting Plan: This Morning’s Top Headlines

Social Media NewsWelcome to this morning’s edition of “First To Know,” a series in which we keep you in the know on what’s happening in the digital world. We’re keeping our eyes on four particular stories of interest today.

Apple Outsells Lenovo in Greater China

Apple‘s sales in greater China surpassed those of Lenovo for the first time in the second quarter of 2011, thanks to a sixfold increase in sales from last year.

AT&T Nixes Limited Texting Plan

AT&T is getting rid of a texting plan that allowed subscribers 1000 messages for $10 per month, leaving them with only an unlimited, $20-per-month plan.

Skype Selling Wi-Fi by the Minute

Thanks to a new iOS app, Skype users can now use Skype credit to pay for Wi-Fi access on their iPhone or iPad devices at more than 1 million Wi-Fi hotspots around the world.

Facebook Begins Rolling Out New Left-Hand Navigation

Facebook has begun rolling out a restructured left-hand navigation that includes revamped bookmarks and notifications for Pages, Groups and Apps.

Further News

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, DNY59

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

05 August
0Comments

White House Twitter Q&A Adds 3,100 Followers Per Day

U.S. President Barack Obama’s #Compromise campaign, which blasted his Twitter followers with the handles of reps to write to, may have cost him some 36,000 followers. (Although he has 9.4 million followers left, and the White House now says the drop was worth getting a debt ceiling deal done.) But now it seems the White House Twitter account is picking up the slack.

@WhiteHouse has added 22,000 followers in the last six days, the administration says. That’s 3,100 followers per day, or a 37% increase on the amount of new followers @WhiteHouse got each day previously. More important for the account’s influence is all the engagement it’s getting: @ mentions of the White House account surged from 500 per day to more than 9,000, a 450% increase in the kind of metric that services like Klout care about.

The reason for all this retweeting? Office Hours, the daily question-and-answer session launched last Tuesday, starring officials from the National Economic Council answering questions on fiscal policy. While that might not sound like the biggest draw on Twitter, there are a handful of reasons that explain why followers are flocking. Firstly, the economics duo — Brian Deese and Jason Furman — are answering our questions on the debt ceiling, which has been on many minds of late. Secondly, as the name of the program suggests, they’re keeping regular, pre-announced daily hours that are amenable to U.S. users. Monday, for example, Deese will be fielding your queries from 5 p.m. ET.

And thirdly, the pair appear to have a sense of humor — as shown when they rickrolled a questioner complaining of boredom. A random Rick Astley video care of the White House may not help anyone’s understanding of economics and the debt crisis, but it certainly provided some much-needed levity.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

Valve Interactive
An online marketing and design agency in Portland Oregon