30 April
0Comments

Apple’s Q2 iPad Sales Weren’t So Insanely Great

ipad-apple-home-600
Despite the gloom surrounding its stock price of late, Apple delivered another blowout quarter on Tuesday, thanks in large part to iPhone sales. But if you took the iPhone out of the equation, the overall numbers were just OK as Macs had a so-so quarter and iPad sales fell on the low end of estimates.

Apple sold 11.8 iPads during the quarter, which was lower than the 12.3 million to 13.5 million units that analysts had been expecting. During Apple’s earnings call with analysts Tuesday afternoon, a few took the opportunity to grill Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer and CEO Tim Cook on the matter. One question was whether the introduction of the $399 iPad 2 had hindered sales of the new iPad.

“We’re just learning about elasticity of demand,” Oppenheimer said. “The $399 iPad 2 is doing well, but the new iPad is on fire.”

Cook said he was “thrilled with the results we’ve seen,” since lowering the price of the iPad 2 to $399, though “it’s too early to come to a clear conclusion.” The cheaper iPad unlocked some education demand, Cook added.

Nevertheless, the numbers were a comedown from the 15.4 million sold in Apple’s fiscal first quarter, which benefitted from the holiday season. Cook and Oppenheimer didn’t offer any more reasons for the perceived shortfall. “The new iPad is on fire. We’re selling them as fast as we can make them,” Cook said. One possibility is that analysts based their estimates on the new iPad’s opening weekend, in which it sold 3 million units.

To be sure, Apple is selling a lot of the devices. Since debuting the iPad in early 2010, Apple has sold 67 million of them. As Cook noted, it took Apple three years to sell that many iPhones and 24 years to sell as many Macs.

Speaking of Macs, those sales were also on the low end of estimates and grew just 7% over the year-ago quarter. Cook said one major reason was that Q2 2011 was a big quarter for Macs. Sales grew 28% in that quarter as the rest of the PC industry posted single-digit gains.

“Yes, I think there was some cannibalization from iPad and the market is slow,” Cook said of Mac sales in the latest quarter. But the “primary factor,” he said, was those year-ago sales.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

05 April
0Comments

Fisker Debuts All-New Atlantic After Securing $392 Million in Funding

01-fisker-atlantic-concept

When Elon Musk envisioned the creation of Tesla, his plan was simple: Develop an exclusive, high-performance sports car for the world’s EV elite, use that money to produce a more attainable mid-range luxury sedan and follow that up with a third, ultra-affordable range of electric vehicles for the masses.

Step one is done. Step two is in progress. But what’s this have to do with Fisker?

Comparisons between the two automakers are all too common – and often all too misguided – but Fisker’s namesake and current Executive Chairman, Henrik Fisker, has a similar plan to Musk’s. It started with the $100,000+ plug-in hybrid Karma and now it’s time to expand with the introduction of the Atlantic.

Formerly known as Project Nina, the newest Fisker is smaller, more attainable and – most importantly – more affordable than the larger Karma. And with a fresh $392 million sitting in Fisker’s coffers after a successful round of fundraising, the Atlantic even has a shot of making it to production.

Like the Karma, Fisker is going with a plug-in series hybrid setup in the Atlantic, comprised of a gasoline engine acting as a generator and sending juice to a brace of centrally mounted batteries that power an electric motor mounted between the rear wheels. Up front is a BMW-sourced, turbocharged four-cylinder engine putting out somewhere in the neighborhood of 240 horsepower and 250 pound-feet of torque. But the exact output is irrelevant since the engine’s gusto is only being used to top up the battery pack.

During the reveal, Henrik Fisker makes it clear that the extended range system is instrumental to the automaker’s ideals, saying simply, “Range equals freedom.”

However, Fisker isn’t providing specifics on range just yet, but it’s likely to be the same or slightly more than the Karma; figure something north of 30 miles of all-electric motoring before the engine kicks in to begin refilling the lithium-ion batteries. Additionally, drivers will be able to manually turn on the engine – just like in the Atlantic’s big brother – to boost performance and battery range.

“This car will be built. It will go into production.”

The styling is just as striking as the Karma, although you’d be forgiven for thinking the Atlantic is just a photocopy of the Karma set at two-thirds scale. But new design elements like the full LED headlamps and rear door handles integrated into the Atlantic’s C-pillars are tell-tale cues that this is more than just a Karma redux. Same goes for the panoramic glass top, which Fisker calls the “Spider roof” because of its multi-point crossmember that doubles as both design element and rollover protection.

Keeping true to Fisker’s stance that concept cars shouldn’t be watered down when they reach the showroom, Fisker is adamant that, “This car will be built. It will go into production.” The automaker claims that the crossmember won’t affect headroom and it took great pains to maximize interior room – something that’s been a consistent gripe with the Karma. And it should have the footprint, saying the Atlantic will be sized similarly to the Audi A5 (around 185 inches in overall length).

Fisker isn’t providing pricing information or an on-sale date, but it’s safe to assume we’ll be seeing a road-going version of the Atlantic within the next two years, and Fisker reluctantly admitted during the press conference that pricing will be in the “upper end of the BMW 3 Series range.”

No matter, the Atlantic will be a looker. “We don’t make concept cars and change them for production,” Fisker said on the eve of the New York Auto Show, “This is a promise of what we’ll deliver.”

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

22 October
0Comments

Business Secret – The Introduction Before the Introduction

Meeting New Friends...

I have something to share with you that will help you go farther with your business networking connections and your friends. If you want to keep your friends and networking connections very happy and very warm, try this one secret trick:

Before introducing someone to that person, send a message to the person explaining the interaction you’re intending to initiate, and see whether it’s something that your friend or contact actually wants to have happen.

The Introduction Before the Introduction

My friend and co-author, Julien Smith, is in Montreal. If I’m talking to … Joyce, and she mentions she’s going to be in Montreal for a few days, my next step should be to email Julien, mention Joyce and what she’s about, and then ask him if he wants to meet her. Then, he can tell me privately that he’s not interested or not around. This introduction before the introduction saves face three ways. 1.) If Julien’s not interested, he doesn’t have to suddenly juggle a new connection that he didn’t want. 2.) If Julien’s not interested, YOU don’t look like a jerk to Joyce. 3.) If Julien is interested, but can’t connect with Joyce at that time, it saves the connection, thus giving Joyce a better chance later to make a better connection.

See how that works?

The Opposite is Frustrating

I get a lot of emails from person A, introducing me to person B, and saying in the letter that I’m going to love the person’s company or product. Here’s the thing: let’s say I received 11 of these messages over the last 3 days (which is pretty much the exact number of such messages I received). Of those 11, precisely 0 of the products or companies I was introduced to were of business interest to me. I’m sure they were wonderful, and I’m sure they’ll be successful in some way or another, but what I will do with this information is unknown to me. First off, I pretty much never write about companies on here. Second, I don’t consult with startups. So, I’m not really sure what the intention of the introduction is, except that I think some people think, “Well, he’s got quite a following, so if he mentions you, then you’ll be set for life.” It really doesn’t work that way. I’m only influential about things that people who spend any amount of time here already care about. If you don’t see me writing about it much, it’s probably not going to be a hit with my crowd.

Use That Business Secret

I promise you that the value of your business connections and professional relationships will flourish once you start parsing that introduction in the manner mentioned above (or similar). It will save face for all involved. It will give everyone a discrete chance to consider the opportunity at hand, and it will lead to better potential pairings than a blind email.

Oh, and for those of you saying, “Who cares? It’s just an email. Delete and move on.” No one likes to be ignored, and no one likes to be politely brushed off. This is a chance to avoid both fates.

What do you think? Do you see yourself having an opportunity to use this?

Chris Brogan is an eleven year veteran of social media using both web and mobile technologies to build digital relationships for businesses, organizations, and individuals.

31 July
0Comments

Flight Sims Now Available With Real Air Traffic Controllers

OSHKOSH, Wisconsin – Flight simulation is about to take an impressive step toward more realistic flight with the introduction of actual air traffic controllers.

Pilots have long used simulators to provide a wide range of training scenarios, from basic navigation to complex system failures. But however lifelike the simulations have been, they’ve always lacked the added realism — and cognitive workload — of interacting with air traffic control.

Pilotedge, a New Jersey company, is here at the big Airventure aviation show demonstrating a new service that brings real, live air traffic controllers to flight simulators across the country.

The company will have several active and retired controllers connected to its network, and they’ll provide the same level of interaction that pilots experience flying in controlled airspace. The system currently is limited to simulated flights in California airspace, but the pilot can be sitting at a simulator anywhere in the country.

Pilotedge founder Keith Smith says he initially built the system to help pilots better learn how to talk with and interact with air traffic controllers.

“I wanted to help people get better on the radio” he says. “But it turns out situational awareness is getting much better.”

An simulator air traffic controller sits at a radar screen showing the location of sim pilots and has a three screen view from the tower at the Long Beach Airport.

Smith had used some of the free air traffic control options people in the flight sim community use, but he found they weren’t reliable and lacked the level of effective training that could be offered.

A wide range of pilots have tried the Pilotedge system. Smith says the simple act of communicating with a controller is a valuable skill to practice if you’re a pilot without a lot of flight time spent with air traffic control.

But seasoned pros have been impressed with the ability to test their situational awareness. Radio calls may be old hat for them, but bringing an air traffic controller into the simulator can make for a much more realistic — and challenging — training experience.

“When was the last time you got an ad hoc hold in the sim,” Smith says, referring to a procedure a pilot may be given when when waiting to land. “It can push experienced pilots over the edge.”

The air traffic controllers can work from home and will operate on actual frequencies used in California airspace. A pilot simulating a flight over the Los Angeles basin can expect to talk to several different controllers, beginning with the clearance delivery on the ground, through the tower and en route controllers. And just like the real world, the pilot will be handed off to several different controllers during the flight as they switch frequencies.

The system is aimed at the flight training marketplace but will be available to home users as well. The retail rate for home users is just $19 per month for unlimited use. Smith says flight schools will pay an hourly rate that will simply be added to the rate the pilot is paying to use the simulator.

Pilotedge is working with Precision Flight Controls, a company that sells many Federal Aviation Administration-approved simulators to flight schools nationwide. But Smith is in discussions to develop versions of his system for companies such as CAE and Flight Safety that operate the simulators used by the airlines and other large aircraft operators.

Photos: Jason Paur/Wired.com

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

15 June
0Comments

Solar Car Carrier Sees The Light Of Day With Hybrid Power

Starting this month, Toyota’s hybrid cars might be arriving on a hybrid ship augmented by solar power.

We first told you about the Auriga Leader, a 60,000 ton carrier that can ferry up to 6,200 cars, back in 2008. It was retrofitted with a giant bank of solar cells in hopes of reducing CO2 emissions and fuel use while carrying mostly Toyotas across the Pacific.

During tests, solar energy made up for one percent of the ship’s total electricity usage — a small percentage, but enough to save 13 tons of fuel. However, solar power also turned out to be just too unreliable as even as a secondary standalone power source on such a large vessel, causing major spikes and shortages of electricity depending on cloud cover.

“Even a slight change in the weather has a significant influence on the amount of power generated,” said NYK line, the Japanese operator of the Auriga Leader. Engineers looked into expanding the number of photovoltaic cells on board, but found that just exacerbated the problem of passing clouds and storms. ”Attempting to make the solar power system bigger to gain more output and to increase its dependency could result in problems with regard to stable operations due to fluctuations in the power supply,” the company said.

Researchers turned to the same solution that land-based solar generating stations use to keep the power on when the sun isn’t out: really big batteries.

The Auriga Leader

The Auriga Leader is setting sail this month with hybrid power system that’s been under development since 2009. On board are massive Gigacell branded nickel-hydrogen batteries, developed by Kawasaki Heavy Industries. The batteries charge and discharge based on the power demands of the ship and the electricity generated by the solar cells.

The latest test is partially funded by Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. If it’s successful, Kawasaki and NYK line hope to commercialize it to decrease the emissions and fuel use of cargo ships, which burn an average 120 gallons of fuel per mile.

In addition to the solar cells, the Auriga Leader’s diesel generator is also being retrofit to run on low-sulfur diesel, and the ship getting a ballast water treatment system to prevent the introduction of invasive species to the ports it visits.

The hybrid powerplant

Photos: NYK Line

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

07 March
0Comments

Behaviorgraphics: Discovering the “Me” in Social Media

    Social media is a deeply personal ecosystem that I lovingly refer to as the EGOsystem. As such, there is a “me” is social media for a reason. It is quite literally a world in which we are at the center of our online experiences, a place where everything and everyone revolves around us.

    Placing ourselves in the role of this emerging social consumer for a moment, brands, businesses, and media aren’t sure how to see or reach us directly yet. We’re lured through creative attempts to follow them on Twitter or “Like” them on Facebook. But for the most part in social media, we are faceless consumers brought only to life through avatars, bios and a history of our online activities and connections.

    Sometimes we’re part of demographic studies where we’re grouped by age, income, gender, education, etc.. Sometimes, we’re part of psychographic studies where we’re grouped by commonalities, shared interests and passions, and themes. And often, we’re lumped together through keyword mentions or online influence scores. But the real question is, who are we online and what makes us connect, share, and live online? Finding these answers is revealing and hopefully, inspiring.

    If ignorance is bliss, awareness is enlightening…

    Behaviorgraphics

    Last year, I teamed up with my good friends at the JESS3 creative agency run by Jesse Thomas and Leslie Bradshaw to capture the essence of how and why people were “living in public.” The characteristics of online behavior were diverse to say the least. However, I documented recurring traits and organized them into 18 categories.

    I’m happy to share that Behaviorgraphics is now available as a free high resdownload and also as a 22 x 28 poster.

    Click below for various sizes(free):

    1. Presentation/Slide

    2. High Resolution

    3. Poster

    Which one/s are you?

    At the center is Benevolence – The unselfish and kindhearted behavior that engenders and promotes recognition and reciprocity, and in doing so, earns the goodwill of those around them. This is the hub of social networking with a purpose, mission, and a genuine intent to grow communities based on trust, vision, and collaboration.

    Problem Solvers – One of the most common sources of conversations and updates in social media are questions…people seeking information in the hopes that commenters will respond with resolution or direction.

    Commenters – Providing thoughts, opinions, observations, experiences, and sometimes, unfiltered reactions to the information shared online. They are less likely to produce original content, but are compelled to share their views based on the introduction of content by others in and around their social graph.

    Researchers – Peer to peer influence is prominent in social networks and researchers rely on their social graphs for information and direction to make qualified decisions. They are also active in championing polls and surveys to truly learn about the thoughts and opinions of those connected to them.

    Conversationalists – Participation in conversations through proactive updates seeking responses or direct responses to other content, conversationalists fuel threads within and across networks.

    Curators – In the context of behaviorgraphics, curators carry a different role. This group works diligently to find and only share what captivates them as filtered by what they believe will interest their followers.

    Producers – Among the more elite group of online participants, their stature is earned by the amount of content they generate within multiple networks.

    Broadcasters – Social media is proving to be both an effective broadcast and conversational platform. Broadcasters are mostly one-way communicators who either intentionally or unintentionally push information to followers without injecting conversational aspects into the mix.

    Marketers – Profiles dedicated to marketing ideas, products, or services and may or may not include content outside of their portfolio, unless the account is focused on funneling beneficial and value-added solutions to specific audiences regardless of origin.

    Socialites – Individuals who have earned varying levels of weblebrity, these new internet famous personae earn recognition and attention in online networks which is increasingly spilling over in real world fame.

    Self-promoters – Unlike broadcasters and marketers, self-promoters are unconcealed in their intentions through constant updating of activities, events, and accomplishments.

    Egocasters – Contribute to the “ego” in the egosystem and represent the evolution of self-promoters. Through constant promotion and the activities and responses that ensue, promoters graduate to a position of perceived prominence and collective unawareness.  What they think and say is what they believe to be the reality for one and for all. They lose touch with perspective as listening gives way to telling…

    Observers – Often referred to as inactives, lurkers, or simply consumers, Observers represent the majority of the social Web today, defined by those who read and also share information in the backchannel, including email, and also in the real world.

    Social Climbers – Social capital is not only something that is earned in social networking, it is something that is proactively pursued by those whose sole mission is to rise to the top. These individuals intentionally climb ladders on the avatars, profiles, and social capital of others most often misrepresenting their purpose and stature to earn an audience based on disingenuous intentions.

    TMI – The things some share in social media continue to blur the line between what’s relegated to inner monologue versus that for sharing with others in public. The state of sharing “Too much information” is dictated by those on the receiving end of the update, not those who publish it.

    Spammers – Those accounts and profiles that are created to push messages blindly and without regard for those with whom they come into contact. Often times they’re tied to current events (using trending keywords or hashtags) or targeting influential voices to lure them into clicking through to their desired goal.

    Leachers -Not included in the graph, but an important category to recognize as leachers take the good work of others and channel it into their own accounts almost exclusively for the sake of promoting their cause.

    Complainers – When we love something, we tell a few people; when something bothers us, we tell everyone.  Complainers are often sharing their discontent as a primary ingredient in their social stream. And, as customer service takes to the social web, these complainers are only encouraged to share their experiences to achieve satisfaction and earn recognition for their role as the new social customer.

    Via Brian Solis: http://www.briansolis.com

    27 December
    0Comments

    Sync Adds Voice Control of Smartphone Apps

    Ford is crazy for connectivity and longs for the day when smartphones are fully integrated into automobiles. It moved closer to that goal today with the introduction of a free app that gives Ford Fiesta drivers voice control of Pandora, Stitcher and OpenBeak on their phones.

    The introduction of AppLink means no more fumbling with your phone to launch the three apps. This might sound superfluous, but Ford says 46 percent of us have apps on our smartphones and 36 percent of us admit using them while driving. As smartphones become ubiquitous, so too will the number of people using apps, even if they’re barreling down the highway at 75 mph.

    “More and more drivers are using their devices and their apps while in the car,” Doug VanDagens, director of connected services, said in a statement. “SYNC and AppLink work hand-in-hand to answer consumer demand for safer, smarter control of smartphones while in the car.”

    Ford cites a study by the Consumer Electronics Association that found 55 percent of smartphone owners prefer voice commands for in-car smartphone integration and says that makes the business case for SYNC and AppLink even more compelling.

    The announcement comes as the Apple iPhone joins Android and Blackberry devices in playing nicely with Sync; all three devices can use AppLink to provide voice control of three popular applications: Pandora internet radio, Stitcher news radio and OpenBeak for listening to Twitter posts. Why anyone would want to listen to Twitter is beyond us, but there you have it.

    To access the app once you’ve installed AppLink, just push the “voice” button on the steering wheel, say “mobile applications” and cite the app you want to launch. Simple.

    Launch Pandora and you can access all your favorite features. Ditto for Stitcher and OpenBeak. Ford says more Sync-enabled apps and integrations are coming soon.

    AppLink is available only on the 2011 Ford Fiesta but will be offered in more models soon.

    Photo: Ford

    Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

    11 April
    0Comments

    The Roman Architecture

    The Architecture of Ancient Rome adopted the external Greek architecture for their own purposes, which were so different from Greek buildings as to create a new architectural style. The two styles are often considered one body of classical architecture. This approach is considered reproductive, and sometimes it hinders scholars’ understanding and ability to judge Roman buildings by Greek standards, particularly when relying solely on external appearances. The Romans absorbed Greek influence, apparent in many aspects closely related to architecture; for example, this can be seen in the introduction and use of the Triclinium in Roman villas as a place and manner of dining. The Romans, similarly, were indebted to their Etruscan neighbors and forefathers who supplied them with a wealth of knowledge essential for future architectural solutions, such as hydraulics and in the construction of arches. Social elements such as wealth and high population densities in cities forced the ancient Romans to discover new (architectural) solutions of their own. The use of vaults and arches together with a sound knowledge of building materials, for example, enabled them to achieve unprecedented successes in the construction of imposing structures for public use. Examples include the aqueducts of Rome, the Baths of Diocletian and the Baths of Caracalla, the basilicas and perhaps most famously of all, the Colosseum. They were reproduced at smaller scale in most important towns and cities in

    http://youtube.com/v/B8IcwFwNLr8.swf

    Valve Interactive
    An online marketing and design agency in Portland Oregon