Archive for March 21st, 2012

21 March
0Comments

The Copyright Question: How to Protect Yourself on Pinterest

Gonzalo E. Mon is a partner in the Advertising Law practice at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP and his co-author, John J. Heitmann, is a partner in the firm’s Telecommunications group. Read more on Kelley Drye’s advertising blog, Ad Law Access, or keep up with the group on Facebook or Twitter.

Although Pinterest launched just two years ago, the site already boasts about 12 million users and a staggering number of daily pageviews. Both numbers are growing quickly. Companies are paying attention to this rapid growth and — much like the early days of Facebook — are wondering whether it makes sense to establish an early presence on the site.

This rush to join Pinterest has been somewhat tempered by concerns over the social network’s terms of use. Namely, people are questioning “who owns what” content.

Some have incorrectly concluded that Pinterest owns everything posted on the site. And others have correctly pointed out that posting other people’s pictures without permission could be problematic.

Before a company — or a user, for that matter — joins Pinterest, it’s important to separate the myths from the realities.


No, Pinterest Doesn’t Own What You Post


One common question is whether Pinterest owns everything that you post. It’s easy to see why people might think that. The terms of use state, “Except as expressly provided in these Terms, Cold Brew Labs and its licensors exclusively own all right, title, and interest in and to the…Site Content, including all associated intellectual property rights.”

The term “Site Content” is defined to include “Member Content,” and the term “Member Content” is defined as “all Content that a Member posts” on the site.

Based on a quick read of the terms, some people have concluded that Pinterest automatically owns all rights, title and interest to anything that a member posts on the site. However, that’s not the case. To learn the truth, you need to read further and determine what the company means by the phrase “except as expressly provided in these Terms.”

The answer appears a few paragraphs later in a section entitled “Member Content,” where Pinterest states, “Cold Brew Labs does not claim any ownership rights in any such Member Content and nothing in these Terms will be deemed to restrict any rights that you may have to use and exploit any such Member Content.”

In other words, you’re not giving up any ownership rights you may have simply by virtue of posting something on Pinterest.


Yes, Pinterest Has Broad Rights to What you Post


That said, when you post content on the site, you do grant Pinterest broad rights to use that content. The terms state, “You hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site…”

If you were offended when you thought Pinterest owned everything, and then were relieved to learn that wasn’t the case, you may get re-offended when reading this section. However, this type of provision is actually very common, and to a certain extent, is necessary for any social media site to run. In fact, if you look at Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, you’ll see members also grant Facebook a broad license to use content.

That’s not to say that the licenses are identical. For example, although Facebook states that the license you grant them “ends when you delete your IP content or your account, unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it,” Pinterest states that the license you grant them is “irrevocable” and “perpetual.”

You’re always going to grant rights to a social media site when you post content, so you may want to read the terms to figure out the extent of those rights.


No, You Can’t Just Post Other People’s Stuff


So, Pinterest has a right to use what you post, but they don’t own it. The big question for companies, though, is do you own what you post?

Keep in mind that, unlike Facebook — which is mostly about creating and posting your own stuff — the focus of Pinterest is posting stuff you find on other sites. And if you find content on other sites, odds are you don’t own it, someone else does. That someone else may have something to say about you posting their stuff without permission.

For consumers, the likelihood that someone will challenge your right to content is probably low. For a business, the risks are much higher for two reasons: 1) commercial use (in other words, for business) is offered less protection; and (2) companies have deeper pockets.

If a company takes an image that belongs to someone else and pins it on a virtual pinboard, it could receive a letter from the copyright owner, accusing that business of infringing his rights. Such letters can lead to lawsuits and monetary penalties.


Yes, You Can Deal with the Risks


If your company sets up a presence on Pinterest, you should only pin content you own or have a license to use. If you have a license, check that license to ensure you are allowed to post the content on Pinterest.

Copyright isn’t the only issue, though. You should also be careful before you post any content that includes celebrity images or third party trademarks. Again, if you don’t have permission from the celebrities or trademark owners, you could be getting a nasty letter.

Although your risks need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, a good rule of thumb when setting up and populating a company Pinterest pinboard is to treat that pinboard just as you would treat your company website. If your legal department would advise you not to post something on the website, you probably shouldn’t pin it to your company’s pinboard, either. Yes, it will limit what you can do on Pinterest, but you (or whoever pays your legal bills) will thank me later.

Image courtesy of Flickr, s_falkow

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

21 March
0Comments

Pinterest Rivals Twitter in Referral Traffic

To those of you who lead “the Pinteresting life,” you’ve contributed to a phenomenon that is certainly putting its clicks where the hype is. By that I mean, Pinterest is a two-year old cultural sensation that is borderline causing dependency among its users and the rabid audiences they’re developed. This rapid fire network has pinned itself to a rocket with estimated unique viewership ascending 429% from September to December 2011…and I’m not even sure if the sky’s the limit here.

For those who are unfamiliar with the fledgling community, Pinterest is a effective marriage of social bookmarking and visual curation with an extremely fervent user base. Essentially, people create a series of pinboards for areas of interest where they pin relevant snapshots with commentary to serve as both a reminder for later reference and also as a tour guide for visitors to learn more about each object.

Many consumer brands are also experimenting with Pinterest, using pinboards to present complementary products, ideas, and imagery to inspire consumers to visualize and remix new possibilities. From fashion to interior design and home to retail to entertainment, brands are using Pinterest to thoughtfully assemble a curated lifestyle. And, they’re packaged for the social and mobile web and optimized for driving actions as part Facebook’s new frictionless sharing ecosystem.

Some initial brands to watch include:

- Whole Foods
- Martha Stewart
- Better Homes and Garden
- Real Simple
- west elm
- Bergdorf Goodman
- Today Show
- Travel Channel
- HGTV
- Nordstrom
- Gap
- Birchbox
- AMD

In addition to soaring traffic, Pinterest is also rising as a bona fide referrer of notable Web traffic. According to a new report published by Shareaholic, Pinterest drove greater traffic than LinkedIn, Google Plus, Reddit, and Youtube…combined. Additionally, Pinterest was just .01% shy of tying Twitter for the 4th spot and .02% behind Google, which currently sits in 3rd place.

It should be noted, that Facebook is clearly the dominant player here, accounting for 26.4% of all referring traffic with StumbleUpon sitting far behind, but firmly in second position.

No report can be fully appreciated at face value. The data as packaged is extremely flattering. Shareaholic based its findings on the aggregated data from over 200,000 publishers that reach 260 million + unique monthly visitors. Publishers using Shareaholic are not reflective of worldwide internet web trends or everyday activity, but they do provide a relevant snapshot of the digital lifestyle within the social web.

What’s most remarkable is that Pinterest is still an invitation-only network. This of course lends to its desirability and mystique. Certainly, as anticipation builds coupled with creative and compelling use cases that continue to emerge, Pinterest shows only signs of remaining #pinteresting and relevant to visualized + curated storytelling and driving meaningful clicks for some time to come.

So what are your thoughts? What do you love about Pinterest? Are you a brand finding success or looking for guidance? Share your stories, experiences and questions below…

Via Brian Solis: http://www.briansolis.com

21 March
0Comments

Facebook Files S-1 for $5 Billion IPO (revealing stats & revenue)

Facebook’s S-1: 845 Million Users Every Month, More Than Half Daily and Nearly Half Mobile | TechCrunch

Updating as this plays out with deeper analysis and links…

Just a few moments ago, Facebook officially filed an S-1  for an initial public offering seeking to raise $5 billion. Here are a few key findings…

- 845 million monthly active users, year over year growth of 39%

- 483 million daily active users as of December, year over year growth of 48%

- 425 million monthly mobile users

- 100 billion friend connections as of December 31, 2011

- 2.7 billion Likes and comments per day during the last quarter of 2011

- $1 billion in profits in 2011

- $3.7 billion in revenues in 2011, soaring 88% between 2010 – 2011

- Profits grew 65% from $606 million in 2010

- Zynga makes up 12% of overall Facebook revenue

- Google posted $961.8 million in revenue and $105.6 million in profit when it initially went public…Facebook’s profits are nearly 10x heading into its IPO

- Facebook 2011 profits were 1.6x that of Amazon, which posted a 45% drop in net income between 2010 and 2011 at $631 million

For press seeking analyst commentary, please contact Altimeter Group at 650-212-2282 or via email.

UPDATE 1: The Hacker Way

Really appreciate the culture of Facebook as mentioned in the S-1 under the heading “The Hacker Way.” Here’s an excerpt:

The Hacker Way

As part of building a strong company, we work hard at making Facebook the best place for great people to have a big impact on the world and learn from other great people. We have cultivated a unique culture and management approach that we call the Hacker Way.

The word “hacker” has an unfairly negative connotation from being portrayed in the media as people who break into computers. In reality, hacking just means building something quickly or testing the boundaries of what can be done. Like most things, it can be used for good or bad, but the vast majority of hackers I’ve met tend to be idealistic people who want to have a positive impact on the world.

The Hacker Way is an approach to building that involves continuous improvement and iteration. Hackers believe that something can always be better, and that nothing is ever complete. They just have to go fix it — often in the face of people who say it’s impossible or are content with the status quo.

Hackers try to build the best services over the long term by quickly releasing and learning from smaller iterations rather than trying to get everything right all at once. To support this, we have built a testing framework that at any given time can try out thousands of versions of Facebook. We have the words “Done is better than perfect” painted on our walls to remind ourselves to always keep shipping.

Hacking is also an inherently hands-on and active discipline. Instead of debating for days whether a new idea is possible or what the best way to build something is, hackers would rather just prototype something and see what works. There’s a hacker mantra that you’ll hear a lot around Facebook offices: “Code wins arguments.”

Hacker culture is also extremely open and meritocratic. Hackers believe that the best idea and implementation should always win — not the person who is best at lobbying for an idea or the person who manages the most people.

UPDATE 2: Risks

As a matter of disclosure, Facebook must release risks to caution investors against buying blindly. Here is the full list as pulled from the S-1. I share it here with you to learn from Facebook’s diligence in constant innovation or as they say “shipping.” It’s a healthy form of inspiration to always compete for the moment and for relevance over time.

1. users increasingly engage with competing products;

2. we fail to introduce new and improved products or if we introduce new products or services that are not favorably received;

3. we are unable to successfully balance our efforts to provide a compelling user experience with the decisions we make with respect to the frequency, prominence, and size of ads and other commercial content that we display;

4. we are unable to continue to develop products for mobile devices that users find engaging, that work with a variety of mobile operating systems and networks, and that achieve a high level of market acceptance;

5. there are changes in user sentiment about the quality or usefulness of our products or concerns related to privacy and sharing, safety, security, or other factors;

6. we are unable to manage and prioritize information to ensure users are presented with content that is interesting, useful, and relevant to them;

7. there are adverse changes in our products that are mandated by legislation, regulatory authorities, or litigation, including settlements or consent decrees;

8. technical or other problems prevent us from delivering our products in a rapid and reliable manner or otherwise affect the user experience;

9. we adopt policies or procedures related to areas such as sharing or user data that are perceived negatively by our users or the general public;

10. we fail to provide adequate customer service to users, developers, or advertisers;

11. we, our Platform developers, or other companies in our industry are the subject of adverse media reports or other negative publicity; or

12. our current or future products, such as the Facebook Platform, reduce user activity on Facebook by making it easier for our users to interact and share on third-party websites.

UPDATE 3: Facebook’s Friends or Who Owns Facebook

Ken Yeung over at bub.blicio.us found this interesting graphic complied by Learnvest based on data published by The WSJ and The Guardian. It’s a visual look at the distribution of Facebook stock. Some interesting pre-trading numbers reveal just how big this IPO is worth to the market, employees, investors, and partners.

UPDATE 4: A Letter from Mark Zuckerberg

Mark Zuckerberg urges understanding before investment. This is an approach that conditions investors for a long-term play rather than a quick and profitable turn. As important, is the focus on culture and values. Facebook invests emotion and aspiration in its mission and purpose, something I think more companies should consider to effectively connect with the human network (you and me).

Here are some highlights…

Facebook was not originally created to be a company. It was built to accomplish a social mission — to make the world more open and connected.

Zuckerberg believes that personal relationships are the fundamental unit of our society

Facebook’s 5 core principles are 1) Focus on impact, 2) Move Fast, 3) Be Bold, 4) Be Open, and 5) Build Social Value.

The Facebook team is inspired by technologies that have revolutionized how people spread and consume information.

Facebook hopes to strengthen how people relate to each other.

Even though Facebook’s mission sounds big, the company is focusing on starting small — with the relationship between two people.

Facebook is building tools to help people connect with the people they want and share what they want, and by doing this we are extending people’s capacity to build and maintain relationships.

Facebook has already helped more than 800 million people map out more than 100 billion connections with a goal of accelerating this “rewiring.”

Facebook seeks to improve how people connect to businesses and the economy.

The company believes a more open and connected world will help create a stronger economy with more authentic businesses that build better products and services.

Facebook observes that as people share more, they have access to more opinions from the people they trust about the products and services they use. As a result, the global social network strives to makes it easier to discover the best products and improve the quality and efficiency of their lives.

This quote by Zuckerberg really captures the spirit of Facebook’s mission, “Today, our society has reached another tipping point. We live at a moment when the majority of people in the world have access to the internet or mobile phones — the raw tools necessary to start sharing what they’re thinking, feeling and doing with whomever they want. Facebook aspires to build the services that give people the power to share and help them once again transform many of our core institutions and industries.”

More data available at SEC.gov.

Via Brian Solis: http://www.briansolis.com

21 March
0Comments

March Madness For Airplane Geeks

Image: AOPA

It’s not too late to jump into a bracket for the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association’s own version of March madness. The aviation group decided to set up an alternative to the NCAA tournament tradition by choosing a group of 64 different airplanes and giving aviation geeks a chance to choose their favorite from several different divisions.

The tournament started last week, so we’re already into round two, but thankfully AOPA has made it easy to jump in any time you want to vote for your favorites. The bracket includes a mix of new and old, big and small and even some helicopters thrown in for good measure.

There were some questionable pairings in the first round that made for difficult choices. Rather than place a perennial favorite like the North American P-51 against a similar vintage fighter, it was paired with a speedy homebuilt composite airplane. The definition of a traditional airplane, the Piper Cub, faced the revolutionary Rutan Long-EZ, and a twin turbine business aircraft went head-to-head with a light sport aircraft.

The voting is open this week for round two and, there is still a good mix of airplanes with enough choices to suit just about everybody’s tastes. Each day the voting is open for just four matches, so you’ll miss your chance to vote for the Piper Cub or Pitts Special (above) after today.

Sadly there is no grand prize of the airplane of your choosing. In fact it’s just competition for competition’s sake. The championship matchup is set for the beginning of April. Tough to say which airplane will take the grand prize, but we would place our money on one that drags its tail.

UPDATE: If you’re not a person who has a favorite airplane, but does fly on the airlines regularly, Gadling has its own aviation themed tournament of top airline annoyances.

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

21 March
0Comments

What’s Love Got to Do with It? The 3P’s of Identity

Guest post by Allison Cerra, author of Identity Shift

With the 2012 Presidential election looming, there’s no shortage of polls to help narrow the field of candidates. I find a recent one from Fox News to be particularly fascinating. Among other questions, Republican primary voters were asked which Republican presidential candidate is most likeable and which they would most trust with a nuclear weapon. While Newt Gingrich scored at the top of the heap in earning the trust vote, he scored only marginally well on the likeability scale. The topic was discussed on the network’s “Fox & Friends” morning show where analysts debated: Which is better – trust or likeability?

In the end, both analysts agreed that likeability is the more powerful weapon in a Presidential race. Look no further than to some of the most charismatic presidents in recent history for evidence of the same. Indeed, likeability has been shown to be a potent influencer in just about any life encounter – from friendships to job recruitment to sales. But, as the Fox poll shows, an issue as paramount to national security as nuclear war raises the importance of trustworthiness in the equation. And, while you and I may not spend our days contemplating the chances of a nuclear attack, raising our consciousness toward such a self-preservation issue may certainly tip the scales in how we view the question at hand.

Cast Your Identity

While we only get the chance to vote for President every four years, we cast thousands of votes each day in other ways. We vote with our time for leisure activities. We vote with our attention in the barrage of advertisements to which we are exposed. We certainly vote with our wallets on purchase decisions amidst a sea of competing options. Merchants are aware of these votes being cast each day. They vie to intercept us at the precise moment of truth with a targeted offer we simply can’t resist. And, in the hyper-connected world in which we increasingly dwell, our digital footprint reveals a treasure trove of information to advertisers eager to learn our likes, dislikes and behaviors – if only we felt comfortable enough exposing it.

While it certainly pales in comparison to the threat of nuclear attack, exposing our digital DNA gets at preservation at a different level – the preservation of the identity we seek to create and protect as our lives are increasingly connected in new ways. This leads us back to the same question: Does trust or likeability matter more when contemplating how and when to reveal one’s digital blueprint to others?

Alcatel-Lucent, a global provider of broadband networks, set out to answer this very question. We visited with respondents in 30 homes across the country, observing them for hours in their natural habitats going about their ordinary day. We followed up with a quantitative study to more than 5,000 consumers across the US from teens to mid-lifers to isolate psychometrics, behaviors and values. Our goal was ambitious: How do the devices and networks connecting us each day affect our view of ourselves and those serving us?

Who Are You?

To answer the question, we first had to understand how respondents view themselves in the networked world that keeps them connected. Through the research, we derived the 3P model of identity.

First, there’s presentation, which speaks to the image I attempt to reflect depending on my context. Before the days of devices connecting us in a 24

21 March
0Comments

We Need An E-Reader For Car Guys

By Jason Torchinsky, Jalopnik

I love the idea of reducing the number of devices I own. The thing I carry in my pocket already takes pictures, plays games, gives me alarms and reminders, browses the web, and even makes phone calls, sometimes. But there’s just some things I do that need their own stuff. Working on my cars is one of them.

jalopnik

Like most car guys (male and female, of course) I use repair books and guides when I work on my cars, and I’ve often wished I had them electronically, so I could more easily access them, search them — the same basic reasons I love having any book in e-reader format. I have three devices I can read eBooks on, as well: A Kindle, a MacBook Air, and an iPhone — and I don’t want to even touch any of them when I’m working on a car. That’s why we need something else. Our own E-Reader. Just for car guys.

Maybe I’m just a disgusting slob, but when I work on a car my hands usually look like I’ve murdered C-3PO after doing repulsive things to his oily innards. My hands are grease and grit encrusted pentapods that would make any touchscreen unusable in seconds, and any trackpad or keyboard a mess. Using the devices I have now is not an option.

I don’t think I’m alone. I think there is a real market for an e-reader device that is designed to be used with greasy, possibly gloved hands and built to take actual abuse.

The kind of thing that can live in your toolbox or trunk without worrying about. I looked around for ruggedized cases, e-readers or tablets, and while some do exist, they all have some fatal flaw, usually that they’re touch screens, which just won’t work.

So here’s what I want:

  • A rugged, rubberized case with a handle
  • No touchscreen; UI would be controlled with a fat, stubby joystick or joypad and a rubberized keyboard. The keyboard would have the letters embossed on it, so there’s nothing to rub off and the more dirt in there, the more legible the keys get
  • The screen can be ePaper or LCD; color’s not really necessary, but could be nice. Backlit would be great.
  • Software: I don’t care if it’s Android or Kindle or whatever OS, as long as repair manuals can be downloaded to it, books searched for key words, and some nice things like step-by-step displays where you see step 1 big and full screen, and single keys take you forward or back. Bookmarking, too.
  • The ability to recharge from a cigarette lighter would be nice, and, if you wanted to get fancy, throw an OBD reader in there.

I made some quick 3D mockups of what I’m thinking of; I like the flip-back keyboard/joystick panel to make a stand, if I do say so myself (though that means a flat joypad for navigation).

The ability to browse the web over wifi or 3G or play videos, etc. would be great, but I could live without that. I just want a good, tough thing I can find all my service manuals in and not worry about when I drop it or get it filthy. So. Who’s with me? Anyone own an electronics factory-city in China I can borrow?

Via Wired Autopia: http://www.wired.com/autopia/

21 March
0Comments

Smartphones, Tablets, PCs, The Devices People Use to Discover Information in Social Media (and when)

My friends over at bit.ly published an interesting graph that reveals the devices as well as the days/times that people use different devices and how and when they consume information. As you can imagine, it’s across the board, but as you can see, there are waves that every device follows, except the desktop.

Desktops are of course the devices that we can assume people use during work hours. As such, they are most heavily used on weekdays before noon. Interestingly enough, phone traffic peaks at about the same times, but not to similar effects. What’s also telling is that tablets are most often used at Tuesday at 5 p.m.And, gaming devices such as Nintendo DS, Wii, and Sony Playstation spike on Thursdays at 5 p.m.

Also, take a look at the double hump (peak with a small valley before another peak) in activity for phones and tablets. The second plateau is nearly at the same level Monday through Thursday but loses momentum through the weekend. Tablets and gaming devices however tend to be the devices that define after hours and weekend activity.http://dl.dropbox.com/u/282497/PlatformTypeHourUsageFull.png

Additionally, the bit.ly team examined which platforms share similar usage patterns. The chart used to convey these patterns is a bit tricky to navigate. Here are some of the highlights…

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/282497/DifferencesFull.png

1. Windows and Linux users behave similarly in social media.

2. Mac OS X is used more like a mobile device than either Windows or Linux on the desktop. This is of course because iOS devices, iPhones, iPods and iPads drive mobile usage.

3. The Kindle is used in a very different manner to engage with the social web. The majority of Kindle usage occurs later in the evening over any other devices.

So what does this mean?

It means that content, to be shareable to its full capacity, must have shareability (SMO) built-in to convert an object into a social object. As such, it must be introduced at the right time and in the right way for each medium. Here, the medium is very much the message. Additionally, information and social objects should be packaged and optimized for each device to increase engagement and shareability. That’s right. This isn’t a one size fits all approach which many publishers typically design for. Essentially, this means that a one-to-many content syndication strategy across the social web is not scalable nor is it practical across devices. Design for the medium.

I would like to see this data not only for clickthroughs or consumption patterns, but also how and when interesting content is shared and how that plays into resonance – the duration and depth information stays visible in the stream.

Image Credit: Shutterstock

Via Brian Solis: http://www.briansolis.com

21 March
0Comments

New Site Turns Friends’ Social Media Posts Into a Personalized Travel Guide

As you watch via social media as your friends travel the world, a new site called Tripbirds turns their Instagram, Foursquare and Facebook posts into a guidebook that can help you plan your own trip.

The site, which launched after a month in private beta on Tuesday, lets users search their friends’ social media activity based on destination and add items to city-specific “to-do” lists.

Instead of relying on friends to create content on a travel-specific site, Tripbirds instead organizes the geotagged content friends are already creating on other platforms in a way that makes it useful for planning a trip. The strategy solves the critical mass problem that makes some social travel sites impractical.

“The whole idea is to build it on as many sources as possible,” says Tripbirds CEO Ted Valentin. “Most geotagged social media apps are about what is happening here and right now and in that app, but we want to take all that data and put it in one place.”

The site also shows which connections have been to your desired destination and makes soliciting advice from them easy. If you decide to plan a trip to Dublin, for instance, you can see which friends have posted to Instagram, Foursquare or Facebook from the city and send them a message to ask for advice. When they come to Tripbirds to recommend which pubs you should check out, their relevant activity is automatically displayed to make recommending specific places easy.

In addition to being practical, this feature gives users an incentive to invite their friends to the site. Tripbirds rightly does not show you geotagged content from friends’ profiles until they give it permission to do so, and its biggest weakness that it is not very useful until a few friends sign up. The recommendation solicitation feature aims to create a natural invitation process.

Tripbirds is one of several sites pursuing social travel recommendations. Other startups in the space include Wanderfly, Gtrot, Gogobot and Trippy.

Valentin, who founded a series of Sweedish user-generated review sites before Tripbirds, thinks interest in the space coincides with a general shift in online recommendations.

“I sort of feel that the web is going through a social transformation,” Valentin says about the interest in social recommendations for travel and elsewhere. “Increasingly people want to get, instead of random information from people they don’t know, recommendations from people who they trust.”

Tripbirds plans to make money through referral fees from hotel booking sites and has in the meantime raised about €550,000 in funding. Investors include the co-founders of SoundCloud and Path founder Dave Morin.

 

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, narvikk

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

Valve Interactive
An online marketing and design agency in Portland Oregon