Archive for November, 2011

29 November
0Comments

The largest independent content sites

Quantcast makes it easy to see the largest one million sites in the US (by traffic). There’s a signficant consolidation going on, with the vast majority of popular sites being owned and controlled by larger, public companies.

Because onine traffic follows, as most things do, a power law curve, the top 100 sites account for a huge amount of overall web traffic–probably more than the next 900 sites combined.

After removing public companies and those that only do commerce, here are the thirty independent companies on the top 100:

facebook.com
twitter.com
wikipedia.org
answers.com
wordpress.com
craigslist.org
tumblr.com
pandora.com
whitepages.com
manta.com
photobucket.com
yelp.com
wikia.com
webmd.com
hubpages.com
metrolyrics.com
inbox.com
squidoo.com
grindtv.com
drudgereport.com
coolmath-games.com
city-data.com
urbandictionary.com
wunderground.com
chacha.com
bleacherreport.com
twitpic.com
deviantart.com
cafemom.com
zimbio.com
typepad.com

By Seth Godin: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/

29 November
0Comments

JumpTime Changes How Online Publications Measure Content’s Value

The Spark of Genius Series highlights a unique feature of startups and is made possible by Microsoft BizSpark. If you would like to have your startup considered for inclusion, please see the details here.

Name: JumpTime

Quick Pitch: JumpTime analyzes the economic value of content based on both its own advertising value and the advertising value of pages to which it directs traffic.

Genius Idea: A new metric for measuring content value.


At first glance, popular web content translates to profitable web content. But after setting economists and computer scientists to work on modeling the reality of the situation, JumpTime begs to differ.

The company launched a product in 2009 that measures a web page’s real-time value based not only on how many times it’s viewed and how much advertisers have paid to be placed on it, but also on how good the page is at directing users to other valuable content on the site. In many cases, content with low appeal to advertisers still adds revenue to the overall website by leading more visitors to pages with higher appeal.

This was the case, for instance, with one of Jumptime clients’ user-generated content sections. From an editorial and brand standpoint, the publication liked the section. But the ad team couldn’t sell it, and the publication planned to eliminate it — until the company measured its value using JumpTime’s metric, FloPower, and saw that it was actually one of the most valuable areas of the site.

“People would go from these areas to the articles with high ad costs,” JumpTime CEO Michele DiLorenzo says. “It was in the publication’s best economic interest to drive traffic to what had before been considered an area with zero value.”

 

 

MSNBC.com, Warnerbros.com, ESPN.com and Hearst Newspapers have all signed on for similar insights. JumpTime’s dashboard shows them the real-time value of each page on their websites and helps them move content that’s creating the most revenue to the forefront. Color overlays indicate more traditional metrics such as clickthrough rates.

While there are numerous tools such as Chartbeat and Google Analytics that help track website traffic data, few analyze the real revenue generated by that traffic. Better number crunching has changed games ranging from Baseball to the stock market, and web publishing could be the next.

“The only way you get this kind of insight is to use a big data solution,” DiLorenzo says.

 

 

Image courtesy of istockphoto, Jaker5000


Series Supported by Microsoft BizSpark


 

Microsoft BizSpark
The Spark of Genius Series highlights a unique feature of startups and is made possible by Microsoft BizSpark, a startup program that gives you three-year access to the latest Microsoft development tools, as well as connecting you to a nationwide network of investors and incubators. There are no upfront costs, so if your business is privately owned, less than three years old, and generates less than U.S.$1 million in annual revenue, you can sign up today.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

29 November
0Comments

Retail Chain Uses Augmented Reality to Render Catalog in 3D

 

 

British retailer Tesco is launching an ambitious augmented reality program on Thursday that will let consumers see 3D images of more than 40 products online.

As outlined in the video above, the technology requires a browser plugin. After that, consumers have to use a “marker” like a Tesco catalog or club card to active the augmented reality (AR). Users can then hold up images from the catalog to their computer’s webcam to see a floating 3D version of the product.

For instance, an image of a TV set in the catalog can be expanded onscreen so you can see its actual size and what it looks like on the back. The AR also lets you play with onscreen LEGO sets. Tesco worked with British tech firm Kishino on the project.

Tesco’s foray into AR comes as the technology recently made some serious inroads in the U.S. In one of the most high-profile AR pushes yet, Starbucks launched a holiday program this month that uses an iOS-based app to make its red holiday coffee cups project images of animated characters.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

29 November
0Comments

6 Must-Have Affordable Web Tools for Non-Profits

Causecast is a Mashable publishing partner that provides a cause integration platform for nonprofits and brands. The following article is reprinted with the publisher’s permission.

Trite but true: the best things in life are free (or at least, heavily discounted). For cause-driven companies and non-profits, purchasing corporate technology products — and hiring an IT team to manage them — is often out of reach, if not just unwieldy for an organization that’s big on mission but not bureaucracy. In recent years however, start-ups and tech innovators have stepped up to the development plate, quietly creating the next generation of web- and cloud-based management tools specifically suited for small and mid-sized organizations.

From newsletter-creation to targeted blog tools, running analytics and making donations, almost every useful service a non-profit or cause-based organization could want has received a technologically innovative makeover, complete with options for every set of needs, challenges, and price-points.

These six tools might not save the world on their own, but they can empower and facilitate users to achieve their own goals faster, better and more cheaply than ever before.

1. Wufoo: Need a form — fast, easily, and affordably? Wufoo launched in 2006 to help individuals and businesses handle everything from creating online surveys to event registration, as well as collecting payments and data. Much like iWeb, Microsoft Office, Pages, WordPress and other office suites and content management systems, Wufoo’s cloud-based system offers both templates and personalized forms (that don’t require a tech staff to create). Even better: Wufoo’s many forms are embeddable, brandable and priced between zero dollars and $199.95 per month.

2. iContact: This one-stop shop manages social media campaigns, email contacts, website analytics, and more. iContact’s real gem, however, is its no-brainer newsletter tool. The HTML-free system features drag-and-drop blocks, hundreds of pre-fab templates, and flexible pricing based on the size of the subscriber base. Prefer to try before you buy? iContact offers a free, 30-day trial.

3. Posterous: Wish you could master the social web, but tailor it to the needs of your organization? With the tagline “share smarter,” Posterous has reclaimed the world wide web with circumscribed, user-generated “spaces” that allow businesses and individuals to create and manage permission-based blogs and photo galleries with controlled access (and pleasing to look at formats). For member-based organizations looking to foster community in a walled web-garden, Posterous has your back. The site also makes good on its tagline by offering autopost services for any social-web destination you can think of — and then some.

4. mGive: Specializing in non-profit fundraising, mGive offers a text-to-donate system that simplifies the process for both contributors and organizations. Once non-profits register with mGive, donors can text a unique keyword to a code provided and “send” in a donation. The texted dollar amount appears on their mobile phone bill, and is distributed to the organization.

5. PageLever: Move over, Facebook Insights. There’s a new tool in town, and it’s all about more thoroughly understanding and utilizing the power of everyone’s favorite social network. PageLever allows organizations to move beyond counting “likes” and on to finding out how engaged its audience or constituents is by creating reports on each post, with a detailed and easy-to-understand analysis of each. The tool reveals which posts are the most engaging to fans, why posts are — and aren’t — reaching fans, and how to leverage and enhance fan bases or constituencies. With interactive and easy-to-read charts, graphs, and number comparisons, PageLever is user-friendly and offers tiered pricing packages (not to mention the occasional non-profit discount).

6. SendGrid: This customizable, cloud-based infrastructure is the tool of choice for non-profits with complex newsletter and outreach needs, as well as a little more web-development savvy on their side. No matter your skill-level in writing code, SendGrid handles a lot of the boring nitty-gritty (like monitoring ISPs and creating real-time analytics) of creating and managing custom email systems. The company’s secret weapon, in fact, is its superior customer service: according to one satisfied non-profit client, someone at SendGrid “always picks up the phone.”

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, manley099

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

29 November
0Comments

RIM Wants You to Forget Your Office Pass on Purpose — And Use Your Phone

BlackBerry Bold Curve 9380 with NFCNear field communication (NFC) is poised to transition from a niche technology to one that makes a difference in retail, advertising and, soon, business. BlackBerry manufacturer Research in Motion recently revealed it’s focusing on helping businesses use NFC-enabled phones as building security passes.

In an interview with ElectricPig, RIM UK Managing Director Stephen Bates explained that there are a number of areas where this communication technology could be useful, “One is mobile payments, one is pairing, Bluetooth pairing with accessories, another one is reading smart posters and the other one is integrating security pass, so building pass access…so the concept that instead of having a pass for your office you can touch and go.”

Like the cards you currently use to check into work (or open that locked front door) NFC works with receivers and transponders that can communicate, but only if the two parts are within a few centimeters of each other. However, placing that communication within a phone has some other, added benefits. The phone is a communication device, so it can receive clearance updates on the fly. For instance, if you’re locked out of Building B because you do not have access, an email to the security administrator could push an update to your phone, which would then update the NFC chip’s clearance information. In a matter of moments, you go from locked out, to checking in.

There’s also the added benefit of one less card to carry or, as is often the case, forget. People rarely forget their phones. There are other ways in which NFC-enabled phones could change our work and business lives. Imagine, for instance if your railroad let you use it as a ticket. The conductor passes his receiver by your phone and gets a message that you have an up-to-date ticket. Phones could be loaded up with subway passes; pass the phone by a kiosk that loads it with virtual tokens and handles the credit-card payment at the same time.

NFC, though, does not exactly enjoy smartphone ubiquity. As of now, it’s mostly Google (with its Nexus Phones), RIM and Nokia that are rolling out NFC-ready devices (Including the just-announced BlackBerry Bold 9790 and Curve 938). That will change, though, as more credit card companies push for NFC-driven mobile wallets systems and companies like TagStand continue to sell NFC tags that can be programmed and placed anywhere.

Focusing on business could also help RIM, which — with slipping market share, lackluster PlayBook tablet sales and a recent, extended outage — has not had the best year. RIM made its bones in business and a return to providing smart solutions for the briefcase set could be a step in the right direction.

Are you ready to start using your phone for everything from mobile payments to proving that you got to work on time? Tell us more in the comments.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

28 November
0Comments

How to Make Customer Service Matter Again Part 1

Part 12 in a series introducing my new book, The End of Business as Usual…this series serves as the book’s prequel.

Over the years, customer service has been something of a paradox within the organization. The name itself inspires dedication to helping people. And while that is the intention of customer service professionals worldwide, customer service as a line item in business accounting has often placed it in the hands of outsourced organizations, under-qualified personnel, or in the hands of customers directly through self-service or automated technology. The mission of course is to improve profitability. It is what it is.

Perhaps it is the moniker of customer service that stifles innovation in philosophy, process and engagement. Perhaps it’s the conditioned nature of the overall role of customer service to be reactive, a gate keeper to negative experiences, or relegated to the outskirts of a business revolution. I suppose that’s the point however. We’re facing a revolution in consumer behavior which in turn triggers a revolution in business. From philosophy to mission and vision to processes and systems to goals and objectives, customer service is an opportunity to instill loyalty and also positively influence the decisions of others.

Here we are facing the end of business as usual and before us are two incredible opportunities for improving customer experiences and ultimately relationships, the democratization of media and connections and the executive decree to move businesses closer to customers. But before we jump in, we must rethink our approach and supporting infrastructure to not only meet the needs of customers, but also transform the organization to shape and steer them in advance of any impetus that would necessitate a response.

In 2011 American Express published its annual Global Customer Service Barometer to measure the current state of customer sentiment toward businesses.

At first glance, the study quickly noted that consumers believe that businesses are meeting expectations but not exceeding them. In a time when business as usual eventually inhibits growth, meeting expectations becomes a commodity. Creating exceptional experiences from here on out is priceless and will eventually become the minimum ante in business. Click on the images for an expanded view.

While certain companies are cutting costs on customer service or not exploring new opportunities for innovation, customers are demonstrating that now’s the time for transformation. People are willing to spend more for products from companies that have a history of good customer service or that deliver outstanding experiences.

People are frustrated with automated systems. They’re also not fond of the new trend in voice response systems that are now becoming industry standard. Would you be surprised if I told you that they just want to talk to another human being? As the numbers spotlight below, whether it’s on the phone, in real life, through instant messaging or social networks, one-on-one interaction will have a one-to-one-to-many result.

As social media becomes more pervasive in the lives of the everyday consumer, not just connected consumers, a new infrastructure will be required to support proactive engagement. For those sitting on the sidelines or casually experimenting with engagement, traditional methodologies and processes in social media will quickly be tested and almost instantly stretched.

Brands are No Longer Created, They’re Co-Created

The image above is a word cloud generated by the Tweets of customers who shared their experiences regarding @United (United Airlines). I removed the colorful language as this isn’t a discussion about United, but instead how customer experiences are shared and how they influence impressions and decisions. Additionally, this is an example of the necessary examination of how businesses are shaping and reacting to customer experiences in the midst of a digital revolution.

My point in sharing this with you today is that the two biggest words that standout clearly and represent the importance of our focus over the next several years are…CUSTOMER SERVICE. If you look closely enough, you’ll see two other words surrounding “customer service”, which I believe symbolize the importance of of a renewed or new customer focus, which center on…response and change.

Revisiting the American Express study for a moment, it’s clear that experiences impact brand perception and ultimately loyalty. Reacting to experiences is no longer good enough.

Not only does a negative experience reduce the overall satisfaction or perception of a brand, consumers are also willing to switch brands to get better customer service. The importance of customer acquisition is called into question when the value of  customer retention is not treasured or improved.

Connected customers will first take to social networks to ask for input as they consider decisions. Rather than rely on Google’s machine algorithm, the feedback that individuals receive in their networks of preference is qualified, trusted and human–basically these exchanges create a searchable and effective human algorithm. Needless to say, it is the experiences of those to whom I trust that define my impressions and following actions. While a website or marketing material may say otherwise, the collective experiences that populate social networks and ultimately my stream, weigh significantly heavier during phases of consideration than company-generated adjectives or imagery.

Engagement and Empathy Creates Positive Experiences

Customer service is often viewed through a lens of “us vs. them.” Businesses have built an incredibly expensive infrastructure to support customers when they need help while keeping them at arm’s length. However, connected customers have given up on these aging systems and are pushing for a more personalized form of engagement. Expressing discontent on social networks necessitates a response from the affected brand and without a response, those experiences further dilute the customer relationship and also taint impressions of those to whom hopeful customers are connected. Also, expressions open the door to competition.

In a study published by Maritz Research and evolve24 in September 2011, just under 1,300 consumers were asked about their experiences with Twitter and customer service. As the respondents’ ages increased, so did their expectations that companies would read and respond to their experiences.

Imagine for a moment, that as a connected consumer, you try using Twitter to get a response that could solve a problem or retain you as a customer only to feel disappointment in the absence of a response. That’s exactly what happened to the respondents of the survey. Just over 70% said that they did not hear from the company as a result of their Tweet. This sets up a bigger problem if the company is in fact on Twitter. It tells the consumer that their experience is unimportant and that the business is only present in social networks to market or sell products and not provide help. Saying nothing to a customer with a problem says everything about how you value them.

Providing resolution is only one part of the value proposition. Engagement as I’ve defined, is the interaction between a brand and a consumer. But it is in how it’s measured that counts.

No, engagement isn’t measured by Likes, comments, impressions, Tweets or Retweets. Engagement is measured by the takeaway value, sentiment and resulting actions following the exchange. People said that they felt better once they were contacted by a company representative on Twitter. That says everything…

In the end, transformation isn’t easy, but if it were, then providing exceptional customer experiences would become a commodity. This is a time when customers can work for you not just against you. And as customers are demonstrating every day in social and mobile networks, without a thoughtful approach or engagement, every Tweet, update, post, video and interaction is working against you right now. Customer relationships are to be shaped, not simply reacted to or  managed. This is why your role within the organization matters now more than ever.

Become the change you wish to see…

 

Via Brian Solis: http://www.briansolis.com

28 November
0Comments

After you’ve done your best

(and it didn’t work)

…then what do you do?

Slamming your six iron into the ground, yelling at yourself, cursing out your staff, second-guessing, berating bystanders—there are plenty of ways we demonstrate our frustration that our best didn’t work this time.

But is it helpful?

Learning from a failure is critical. Connecting effort with failure at an emotional level is crippling. After all, we’ve already agreed you did your best.

Early in our careers, we’re encouraged to avoid failure, and one way we do that is by building up a set of emotions around failure, emotions we try to avoid, and emotions that we associate with the effort of people who fail. It turns out that this is precisely the opposite of the approach of people who end up succeeding.

If you believe that righteous effort leads to the shame of personal failure, you’ll seek to avoid righteous effort.

Successful people analytically figure out what didn’t work and redefine what their best work will be in the future. And then they get back to work.

Let the guys at ESPN do the racket throwing.

By Seth Godin: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/

28 November
0Comments

Media Consumption Showdown: Kindle Fire vs. iPad 2

After our initial Kindle Fire review, we wanted to take a closer look at how Amazon’s new tablet compares with the iPad 2 as a media consumption device.

Like Apple, Amazon has paired the Kindle Fire with a complete end-to-end media solution. Users can buy apps, books, music and video files all from one account and one interface.

As someone that has invested heavily in both the Apple and Amazon ecosystems, I wanted to compare the experiences in terms of media consumption. This means the ease of use in listening to music, watching movies and TV shows and purchasing apps.


Screen Size Realities


Like its eInk predecessors, the Kindle Fire is a 7″ device. The iPad (and the iPad 2) has a 9.7″ screen. Both run at about the same resolution — 1024×600 for the Kindle Fire and 1024×768 for the iPad — but the difference in aspect ratio and screen size offers up some differences.

The Kindle Fire is an ideal size for reading text (though not necessarily magazines), but it pales when compared to the iPad for viewing video. Playing back a video on the iPad in portrait orientation yields the same video size as the Kindle Fire in landscape.

Moreover, the Kindle Fire’s resolution is still in the realm of standard definition. From my tests, high definition content on the Kindle Fire didn’t look any better than the same content on the iPad.

The Kindle Fire’s screen size and aspect ratio work well for 16×9 formatted content, but for many television shows, the 4:3 aspect ratio of the iPad is actually preferable.

Ultimately, screen size is an important consideration, especially if video consumption is going to be a common activity.

Since screen resolution is nearly identical, I give the edge to the iPad 2.


Streaming vs. Downloading


 

 

Apple and Amazon both sell a variety of film and television content through their tablets. Apple’s approach is to download the video content to a device (the exception is the Apple TV 2, which simply streams content off Apple’s servers), whereas Amazon streams its content.

For home media consumption, the difference is largely one of semantics. Whether I’m watching an episode of Arrested Development via iTunes or streamed from Amazon Video, the content is still being delivered to me.

The advantage of downloading content is that it can be viewed in those rare instances when one is offline. For most users, however, constant connectivity is the norm.

Amazon goes one step further than Apple with its offerings, thanks to Amazon Prime Instant Video. Amazon Prime members get access to a growing collection of television and film content that can be streamed for free on supported devices. The only tablet to date to support Prime Instant Video is the Kindle Fire.


Third-Party Services


 

 

Apple and Amazon have both worked to create end-to-end content solutions, but nothing exists in a vacuum. A tremendous part of the iPad’s value is that it can also access third-party media services from companies like Netflix, Hulu Plus, the BBC and more.

Likewise, a string of third-party services signed on to support the Kindle Fire.

This is actually the Kindle Fire’s biggest weakness. While the major content players are accounted for, there are still a number of services and content sites that are not accessible from the Kindle Fire.

Here are some of the apps I can use on the iPad to watch video content:

  • Hulu Plus
  • Netflix
  • HBO Go
  • NBC
  • ABC
  • Crackle*
  • Optimum Online (my cable company app)
  • SnagFilms*
  • ABC Player
  • PBS
  • EyeTV
  • adult swim
  • TNT
  • TBS

The options in bold are also available on the Kindle Fire. The “*” indicates that an app is available for Android, but not the Kindle Fire (at least, yet).

While it’s true some of these apps require cable subscriptions or logins to function, many are absolutely free.

Additionally, the streaming rental service Vudu works on the iPad, albeit in SD only.

This is a big discrepancy in content options. For many users, it won’t matter. For my own use, not having access to HBO or my cable company app is a huge loss.


Audio


Amazon integrates the Kindle Fire with Amazon Cloud Player, much like Apple integrates the iPad with iTunes. Again, the difference really comes down to streaming vs. downloading.

As we mentioned in our iTunes Match review, Apple treats iTunes in the Cloud as a hybrid solution between streaming and downloading. Non-local tunes are played back from the cloud, but also downloaded for offline access. You can remove tracks to save space later.

Amazon’s approach is almost identical. The one exception is that users have the option of choosing to download an album for offline listening.

The cloud components of iTunes Match and Amazon Cloud Player are very, very close. Apple definitely makes the process of getting music to the cloud more seamless and friction-free, but the basic playlist syncing and tablet browsing experience is about the same on both.

The vast majority of subscription streaming music services — including Spotify, MOG, Rdio and Rhapsody work on both the iPad and Kindle Fire.


Overall


Although the Kindle Fire is a valiant competitor, its lack of support for a full array of video content gives the iPad the edge.

My iPad can actually replace my television set (and thanks to Cablevision’s iPad app, it largely has) and iTunes Match means it’s a great music jukebox too. The Kindle Fire isn’t robust enough to serve as the center of my media-centric universe, but it’s awfully close. And at $200, that might just be enough for some.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

28 November
0Comments

How Samsung Used Angry Birds to Generate Over 12 Million Minutes of Brand Engagement

The Modern Media Agency Series is supported by IDG. The only thing to grow faster than electronic communication is the amount of digital content. It’s difficult for buyers to find what they want. It’s not much easier for sales reps as IDG Connect’s Bob Johnson found in his research into content used by sellers and buyers…

In an overcrowded and over-hyped marketplace, how do you generate genuine buzz around a smartphone launch? Media communications agency Starcom took an interesting and innovative approach with the recent global launch of the Samsung Galaxy SII by creating an exclusive level of the super-popular mobile game Angry Birds.

“Phone launches have become ever more competitive with an incredible amount of pressure to prove successful within the first few weeks. If Samsung wanted to make an impact with the launch of Galaxy SII, they needed something that was globally relevant, highly engaging and easily scalable across dozens of local markets,” explains Kristen Kelly, VP global business director of Starcom.

“Mobile games and Angry Birds were that opportunity. We knew that our target audience used social games far more often than they watched prime-time television shows, and as the number one mobile game in the world, a partnership with Angry Birds would offer us meaningful access to their over 50 million unique active fans. In addition to the custom Galaxy level, we created an online area for users with never before seen images, online video and a contest where users could enter to score highly coveted Angry Birds’ merchandise, as well as bragging rights to those fans who secured the exclusive ‘Golden Egg.’”


The Partnership


 

 

Starcom collaborated with Rovio to create the Galaxy SII level, with Samsung getting unrestricted access to the beloved Angry Birds characters. Rather than just a badged level, Starcom worked with Rovio and Enrich Mobile to offer a much more compelling, integrated experience and incidentally, the first ever Angry Birds level to be played in zero gravity.

The Angry Birds characters were used in mobile rich media units and video strategically placed throughout the Angry Birds mobile game. Samsung ran more than 14,000,000 rich media impressions within the Angry Birds game mainly in Europe, Asia and Australia, driving users through to a Samsung-owned mobile landing page, which acted as the hub of the campaign.

With the mobile media spend focused on the game, it was complemented by a global social media campaign, with promoted posts on both the official Angry Birds Facebook and Twitter accounts.


The Hub


 

 

Getting potential players through to the “hub” was of course, just the start. The landing pages on both web and mobile allowed Angry Bird users to watch a video showing them how to unlock the “Golden Egg.”

Crucially Rovio designed the gameplay so that the virtual prize, the aforementioned Golden Egg, would be almost impossible to find without watching the video, being told virally via social media, by friends or via message boards.

The news spread quickly, creating a viral buzz for the weird, spacey level and of course, the Samsung Galaxy SII. Starcom reports a high click-through rate to the Samsung SII product pages from the hub, and a high number of competition entrants keen to win Angry Birds merchandise. This campaign had thousands of entries, says Starcom, all of whom Samsung can now communicate with directly.

Justin Lello, CEO of Enrich Mobile, describes the campaign as “seamless to the user in the publisher environment.”

“The Angry Birds/Samsung Galaxy SII campaign was a classic demonstration of how an integrated sponsorship campaign created positive viral buzz from devoted Angry Birds fans around a very slick Samsung owned environment and game play,” says Lello.

“Through this integrated approach, users build positive relationships with brands and in turn an exponential earned return unobtainable through standard display media.”


The Results


 

 

Users have spent more than 12,800,000 minutes engaging with the Samsung branded level. It can be seen as an example of how modern agencies can execute an integrated marketing campaign.

“The development of an ownable Golden Egg Galaxy level, combined with targeted mobile rich across technology and entertainment environments, delivered an incredible response to the campaign — more than 1.6 million game plays and average of eight minutes of engagement per user,” reports Kelly.

“As the level itself was playable globally, the organic seeding and earned online buzz led to game plays from all corners of the globe. Starcom recognized the power of leveraging paid, owned and earned, and negotiated with Rovio to broadcast a message to their Angry Birds Facebook Fan page about the promotion — to 4MM+ fans.”

“We also broadcast the message on Samsung’s Facebook page as well. This active approach to harmonizing the effects of paid, owned and earned, established the success of the Galaxy SII launch. Galaxy SII is already Samsung’s best ever selling phone with more than five million handsets sold in just three months.”


Series supported by IDG


 

 

The Modern Media Agency Series is supported by IDG. There’s universal agreement that digital information is very important for vendors and their prospective customers. But, the amount of content is overwhelming for both groups. IDG Connect’s Bob Johnson conducted research this year to better understand how the content could be improved. Johnson spoke with IDG Strategic Marketing Services Director Howard Sholkin about content valued by users

 

 

Images courtesy of Angry Birds Nest

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

28 November
0Comments

How Salman Rushdie Used Twitter to Defeat Facebook

In the annals of Facebook, this will hardly be remembered as the social network’s finest hour.

On Monday, world-famous author Salman Rushdie, who won the “Booker of Booker” prize for his novel Midnight’s Children, revealed that Facebook had deleted his account at the weekend — and then, when he sent the company a copy of his passport to prove who he said he was, denied him the right to use “Salman” as his first name. (The author’s full given name, which he never uses, is Ahmed Salman Rushdie.)

Facebook compounded the error by failing to respond to Rushdie’s requests — until the author took to Twitter to share his tale of frustration. He encouraged his followers to make light of the situation, thereby attracting the social network’s attention.

It worked. Facebook reinstated Rushdie’s profile in a matter of two hours, and in another hour the company had issued an official apology. Still, the incident throws light on an important and odd Facebook regulation: you can tell the service you are called whatever you like, but if it ever sees your ID, you’ll be forced to go with your given name.

Here, in Joseph Campbell-style storybook form, is how Rushdie’s tweets unfolded.

Via Mashable: http://www.mashable.com

Valve Interactive
An online marketing and design agency in Portland Oregon